IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/euilaw/p0084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rationality within REACH? On Functional Differentiation as the Structural Foundation of Legitimacy in European Chemicals Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Poul Kjaer

Abstract

This paper analyses the potential legitimacy basis of REACH, the new regulatory system for the EC chemicals market. It is argued that three different potential sources of legitmacy exists: i) the quasi-democratic process within which it was established; ii) proceduralisation; and iii) through an institutional design which is aimed at fostering deliberation. This threefold legitimacy basis reflects the hybrid nature of the regulatory structure of REACH. It is, however, also argued that the underlining feature of all three forms is that they are based on or conditioned by a high level of functional differentiation. Hence, it is argued that the prevalence of functional differentiation serves as a structural condition for the construction of an adequate legitimacy basis for transnational regulatory structures. In addition, functional differentiation must be regarded as a source of legitimacy in its own right. An adequate model of transnational governing and governance in the European context must therefore systematically confront the reality and necessity of functional differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Poul Kjaer, 2007. "Rationality within REACH? On Functional Differentiation as the Structural Foundation of Legitimacy in European Chemicals Regulation," EUI-LAW Working Papers 18, European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/6948
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joerges, Christian, 2007. "Integration through de-legislation? An irritated heckler," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 3, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    governance; legitimacy; non-majoritarian institutions; regulation; risk regulation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Machteld Nijsten (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eui.eu/LAW/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.