IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/9515.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Popular Attitudes Toward Free Markets in Iran, the Former Soviet Union and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nader Habibi

    (Brandeis University)

Abstract

A survey of attitudes towards markets which was originally conducted in the U.S and the U.S.S.R. in 1991 was repeated on a random sample of residents of Tehran in 1994. The survey results for the three countries have been compared. The results show that the attitudes of Iranians (residents of Tehran) on some aspects of market institutions are similar to Americans and Russians. Similarity of attitudes was observed on the fairness of profiteering, importance of incentives, appropriateness of exchange of money in dealings with friends and relatives, and comprehension of compensated price changes. On the other hand, significant differences were found on the following issues: Iranians are most supportive of price controls and commodity rationing in cases of shortages; Iranians are more pessimistic about social acceptability of businessmen; a larger portion of Iranians think that demand-pushed price increases are unfair. These anti-market attitudes might be a major reason for the recent resistance to market-oriented reforms in Iran.

Suggested Citation

  • Nader Habibi, 1995. "Popular Attitudes Toward Free Markets in Iran, the Former Soviet Union and the United States," Working Papers 9515, Economic Research Forum, revised 07 1995.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:9515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bit.ly/2tz7aRK
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çokgezen, Murat, 2011. "Attitudes of Turkish students towards markets: A comparison," MPRA Paper 32346, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:9515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.