IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1352.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

THE POLITICS OF TRADE PROTECTION: EVIDENCE FROM AN EU-MANDATED TARIff LIBERALIZATION IN MOROCCO

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Ruckteschler

    (University of Oxford)

  • Adeel Malik
  • Ferdinand Eibl

    (King’s College London)

Abstract

Although non-tariff measures (NTMs) have surpassed tariffs as the most prevalent instrument of trade protection globally, our knowledge of what drives these NTMs is extremely limited. This paper sheds light on the political determinants of non-tariff protection using a rich empirical setting in Morocco. Taking advantage of a bilateral EU-Morocco trade agreement that resulted in an across the board tariff cut and a subsequent rise in NTMs, we use a difference-in-differences regression framework to show that sectors with close prior political connections to the royal family received disproportionately higher levels of non-tariff protection than unconnected sectors. We also demonstrate that, in the wake of the EU-induced tariff cut, connected sectors were mainly compensated through technical barriers to trade that depend on administrative oversight and are vulnerable to political influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Ruckteschler & Adeel Malik & Ferdinand Eibl, 2019. "THE POLITICS OF TRADE PROTECTION: EVIDENCE FROM AN EU-MANDATED TARIff LIBERALIZATION IN MOROCCO," Working Papers 1352, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Oct 2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://erf.org.eg/publications/the-politics-of-trade-protection-evidence-from-an-eu-mandated-tariff-liberalization-in-morocco/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bit.ly/2ZZDDPN
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.