IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/25815.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feasibility Study: Introducing “One-In-One-Out” in the European Commission - Final Report for the German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Renda, Andrea
  • Laurer, Moritz
  • Modzelewska, Ada
  • Zarra, Antonella

Abstract

The need to consolidate and streamline the stock of legislation and reduce the unnecessary costs associated with legal rules has been increasingly felt by regulated stakeholders and governments in many developed and emerging economies. In many OECD countries, including many EU Member States and Canada, Korea, Mexico, the United States, this has led governments of various political orientations to introduce forms of regulatory budgeting, in which administrations are asked to identify, whenever new provisions introduce regulatory costs, existing provisions that could be repealed or revised, thereby offsetting the cost increase. In some countries these rules have implied a one-to-one offset, whereas in other countries the provisions imposed also a reduction, as in the case of UK’s one-in-two-out and one-in-three-out rules, and the US one-in-two-out rule. This is why we generically refer to these rules as “One-In-X-Out”, or OIXO. Overall, national experiences with OIXO rules have led to positive results: hence, many EU member states have started to advocate the adoption of a similar strategy also at the EU level. Most recently, the new President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, announced that the institution will apply the “‘One-In, One-Out’ (OIOO) principle “to cut red tape”, making it now officially part of its better regulation agenda. However, its contours and modus operandi must still be defined. Based on the results of our analysis, we developed a proposed system, which would be likely to achieve the positive results observed in member states and other OECD countries, while at the same time mitigating or fully addressing the concerns expressed by the previous Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Renda, Andrea & Laurer, Moritz & Modzelewska, Ada & Zarra, Antonella, 2019. "Feasibility Study: Introducing “One-In-One-Out” in the European Commission - Final Report for the German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy," CEPS Papers 25815, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Feasibility-Study.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cesar Cordova-Novion & Stephane Jacobzone, 2011. "Strengthening the Institutional Setting for Regulatory Reform: The Experience from OECD Countries," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 19, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Édgar González López (Director), 2017. "El ecosistema digital y las autoridades de regulación de los sectores audiovisual y TIC," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 948, htpr_v3_i.
    2. Leoš Vítek, 2012. "Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 63-78.
    3. Renda, Andrea, 2017. "Introducing EU Reduction Targets on Regulatory Costs: A Feasibility Study," CEPS Papers 12740, Centre for European Policy Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.