IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/6559.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Faculty Retention factors at European Business Schools. How Deans and Faculty Perceptions Differ

Author

Listed:
  • Moratis, L.
  • van Baalen, P.J.
  • Teunter, L.H.
  • Verhaegen, P.H.A.M.

Abstract

Developments in the management education environment present business schools with several challenges. Among these, perhaps the most important to address relates to a mission-critical resource for business schools: faculty retention. In this paper, we position and examine this problem within the context of business schools. We present the results of a research project on faculty retention that was conducted in 2003-2004 among European business school faculty and deans. The results identify the most important factors for faculty retention and suggest that there are perception gaps between faculty and deans on these factors that could lead to distorted decision-making and suboptimal resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Moratis, L. & van Baalen, P.J. & Teunter, L.H. & Verhaegen, P.H.A.M., 2005. "Faculty Retention factors at European Business Schools. How Deans and Faculty Perceptions Differ," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-028-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:6559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/6559/ERS-2005-028-LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Nderitu, 2014. "Human Resource Strategies on Retention of Faculty in Private Universities in Kenya: A Case of Daystar and Pan Africa Christian Universities. Faculty Retention Gap," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2(9), pages 435-449.
    2. Alexandru Trifu & Ina Croitoru, 2014. "A SWOT Analysis of Today’s Crowdsourcing Process," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2(10), pages 487-493.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European business schools; business schools at risk; perception gaps between faculty and deans; retention factors; retention strategies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:6559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.