Author
Abstract
Ireland is (together with Greece and Portugal) a euro-zone country, which is receiving financial assistance. It is conditional on acceptance of recommendations of common experts groups of European commission, European central bank and International monetary fund. Macroeconomic stabilization including fiscal restrictions is a part of these recommendations. This recommendation is usually criticized by necessity of expansive fiscal policy during the time of crisis. The goal of this paper is to take part of this discussion by constructing a macroeconomic model of Ireland, which would be a compromise between simplicity and transparency on one hand, and containing of all necessary connections on the other hand. The principal of decreasing abstraction was used in construction of IS-LM, Mundell-Fleming and IS-LM-BP models. Several possible alternatives of suitable parameters on real exchange rate in euro-zone were used. By least squares method we estimated individual equations of behavior on time series of Ireland before and including crisis. We took into account statistical significance of elasticities. Qualitative analysis of the model was done by method of derivation of implicit function. For the small and open economy of Ireland, by applying of IS-LM-BP model we received very similar results than when applying Mundell-Fleming model. These results confirmed validity of basic macroeconomic connections but also led to some non-trivial macroeconomic connections. In the investment function during the pre-crisis period, the effect of interest rate was not significant, what show problems of Irish investment boom. When applying the crisis period, the effect of interest rate started to be significant, this could imply success of Irish stabilization policy. From the IS-LM-BP model analysis, we can draw that restrictive fiscal policy has negative effect on GDP, decrease of public spending by 1 bil Euro decreases GDP by 0.72 bil Euro, increase of taxes by 1 bil Euro decreases GDP by 0.46 bil Euro. Restrictive fiscal policy also increases interest rates. Increase of risk premium decreases GDP. The non-trivial results are that direct debt from abroad decreases in the volume of 1 bil Euro decreases GDP by 0.7 bil euro. On the other hand, sterilized direct investments of 1 bil euro cause increase of GDP by 0,92 bil Euro.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.