Author
Abstract
Trade liberalization in Kenya started in the early 1980’s with the structural adjustment programmes, and continued under the reciprocal trade liberalization under the WTO framework. There are several arguments that have been put forward in favour of trade liberalization such as economic growth, in that countries that have opened their markets have experienced higher growth, increased incomes and diffusion of advanced technologies. However, while trade liberalization comes with opportunities for development, it also has several challenges especially of increasing incomes and income inequality in a manner sufficient to foster development in such a way that one is able to economically satisfy his/her needs and self esteem in conducting economic relations and freedom in choosing his/her destinyIn trying to examine the impact of trade liberalization on poverty in Kenya, a CGE model based on the Kenyan SAM for 2003.The households were divided into deciles resulting into 20 household categories for both urban and rural cohorts. The preliminary characteristics of the households were examined and then simulations were undertaken to examine the impact of trade liberalization on households under different scenarios. The scenarios examined were: full liberalization while excluding sensitive products, full liberalization with sensitive products, full liberalization with a 30 percent increase in Donor aid and full liberalization with a 10 percent increase in foreign direct investment. The main findings were that while factor incomes increased marginally, the distribution of incomes did not improve to address inequality. Trade liberalization had positive impact on household welfare in general even though the increases were quite small. Furthermore, trade liberalization affected both urban and poor households differently. Trade liberalization in Kenya can be said to be is pro-rural poor since they experience the highest increase in welfare, in contrast for the urban poorest households , trade liberalization accompanied by foreign direct investment is important in improving the welfare of the urban poorest since all their incomes come from enterprises.
Suggested Citation
Miriam W O Omolo, 2011.
"The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Poverty in Kenya,"
EcoMod2011
3001, EcoMod.
Handle:
RePEc:ekd:002625:3001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:3001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.