Author
Listed:
- Guido Alfani
(University of Bocconi)
Abstract
"Wealth concentration and distribution during Early Modern Age is not a favoured field of study among economic historians. Much more interest has been devoted to income distribution, and research has focussed mainly on the period affected by Industrial Revolution (about 1750-1900). Surely this is due to the fact that interest in variation in inequality (of income and of wealth) in the past has mainly originated from the hypothesis of Kuznets (1955), according to which a clear pattern between per capita income and inequality can be discerned. Inequality would be relatively low in pre-industrial societies (Modern-Age societies as well as poor societies of any epoch), then would increase in the first stages of the industrialization for later inverting the trend and starting to decrease. Some years ago Van Zanden suggested, for the case of Holland, the existence of a “Super-Kuznets Curve” spanning many centuries, actually connecting “modern” and “pre-modern” growth which as a whole would be associated with a long-term phase of rising inequality, followed by a downward phase only in the 20th century . Holland however during Early Modern Age was probably the fastest growing economy of Europe. On the contrary, Italy is commonly thought to start declining since 16th Century. We could thus wonder in which way long-term economic decline influenced wealth concentration. The paper presents a first case study developed in the context of a broader research project, financed by Bocconi University and other Institutions, which aims at studying in a comparative perspective concentration and distribution of wealth in Northern Italy since about 1400 up until the beginning of the Industrialization. The case is that of the small city of Ivrea, part of the Duchy of Savoy and placed in Northwestern Italy, for which an exceptional documentation survived comprising censuses, “estimi” (property tax registers) and the much rarer “libri delle correzioni degli estimi” (literally, books of corrections of the property tax registers). After almost 10 years of research I have put together a unique database of information about distribution of real estate and other components of wealth spanning 15th-17th Centuries. For 17th Century I have been able to reconstruct indexes and measures of concentration on a yearly basis, which allowed me to study in detail the effects on wealth distribution of shocks such as the terrible epidemic of plague of 1630. The data suggests that the degree of concentration of wealth was very resilient, given that after a sharp decrease in inequality at the time of the plague the big patrimonies were very quick to recompose themselves so that a concentration even higher than in the past was reached in just a few years. Inequality also increased due to poor “foreigners” who came to live in the city, filling in the gaps opened by the epidemic. Ivrea is the perfect example of a community declining both from the demographic and economic point of view during Early Modern Age, so that it is an excellent starting point to develop the issue of the relationship between decline and concentration of wealth in pre-industrial societies. However, a phase of economic decline seemingly does not correspond to a decrease in inequality, but to a stagnation or even to a slow increase of the value of Gini indexes and similar. This finding poses some problem of interpretation given that it does not fit well in the Kuznetian model as applied to pre-industrial Europe by Van Zanden. Other issues which are discussed in the paper include the theoretical problems raised by the unavailability of information about every component of wealth (a census of Ivrea dated 1613 is the rare exception, allowing for deep analysis of the distortions caused by focussing on real estate registered in the estimi as a proxy for wealth) and the effects of the new, aggressive stance about real estate of Catholic clergy during the so-called Counterreformation."
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:8033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.