Author
Abstract
"Economic historians are taking a closer look at inventors. Recently, several studies of inventive activity during early industrialization have adopted a prosopographical approach. The patent records provide an obvious source of collective biographical information, but they capture only a sub-set of all inventive activity and provide only sparse biographical details. In a pioneering prosopography of American ‘great inventors’, Khan and Sokoloff have drawn on biographical dictionaries to supplement their databases of US patentees, thereby throwing new light on inventors’ personal characteristics and entrepreneurial behaviour. The publication of the new Oxford Dictionary of National Biography provides an excellent opportunity to conduct a similar exercise in Britain. In anticipation of this, we investigate the representation of inventors in the original DNB (published 1882-1900) and subject its selection criteria to critical scrutiny. Methodologically, this is a vital preliminary step. First, the Oxford DNB, while revising the entries of the original edition, includes them all: there are additions to the list, but no deletions. Consequently, the Victorians’ selection criteria will continue to inform the twenty-first century’s concept of ‘the inventor’. Secondly, it is essential to scrutinize our sources for potential biases. Inevitably, this iconic work of collective biography does not provide a random or representative sample of inventors for prosopographical analysis; neither does it offer an objective set of the UK’s greatest inventors. In particular, our analysis suggests that (after gender) the type of invention and the patenting strategy that an inventor adopted were the primary determinants of inclusion in the original DNB."
Suggested Citation
Christine MacLeod & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2005.
"‘The ingenious crowd': a critical prosopography of British Inventors, 1650-1850,"
Working Papers
5057, Economic History Society.
Handle:
RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5057
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.