Inequality within a minority: Jewish wealth in Vienna, 1938

"In 1938, the year in which Nazi-Germany occupied and annexed Austria, the Jewish population formed the most important minority in Vienna. At that time about 175,000 Viennese were Jewish; furthermore, national socialist authorities regarded almost 16,000 additional persons as Jewish, due to the religious affiliation of their parents or grand-parents. These 190,000 persons constituted about 11 percent of the overall population of Vienna and about 92 percent of the Jewish population of all Austria. Immediately after the occupation, the German authorities issued a decree which forced all Jewish Austrians who owned assets of more than 5,000 Reichsmarks (RM) to declare their wealth, except domestics and personal belongings, in detail. In the following years, these declarations were to serve as a preparation of subsequent expropriation; however, in 1938 this fact was not entirely clear for wealth owners. The forms used in the process included dozens of categories to be filled. For instance, wealth owners had to list landed property or securities item by item and to specify them in detail. In their structure and the information they contain, the declarations resemble probate inventories, a resemblance which exceeds superficial similarities given the fate of Jewish Austrians in the following years: one third of them were murdered by National Socialists; for them the declarations can truly be regarded as a kind of probate inventories established in life-time. Two thirds of Jewish Austrians managed to leave the country and survived abroad, and only a few thousand of them survived the Nazi period remaining in Austria. Among 190,000 Jewish Viennese, 43,600 persons who actually owned at least 5,000 RM issued their declarations; in addition, 2,700 persons who owned less than 5,000 RM unnecessarily did the same. For this paper, 5,955 cases with a minimum wealth of 5,000 RM were chosen randomly and recorded in detail. The paper addresses the following questions: 1. Can the forced declarations demanded by Nazi authorities be regarded as reliable sources for wealth held by Jewish owners? On the whole, the declarations are a reliable source for Jewish wealth in 1938 because major parts of the assets like landed property or businesses could not possibly be concealed and other parts were probably declared correctly under heavy pressure by a brutal regime. Moreover, examples from an earlier period suggest a considerable propensity of Austrian wealth holders to declare their property correctly even in cases where evasion would have been easy. Therefore, even if some wealth-holders succeeded in concealing part of their wealth this had probably little influence on the overall results. 2. How much wealth did Jewish owners declare? This section offers a straight-forward estimate of wealth; the results are in accordance with earlier estimates, the first of which were given by the Nazi authorities themselves. Since the declarations are considered to offer reliable information, major corrections of these estimates are unnecessary. 3. How much wealth did those Jewish owners hold who owned less than 5,000 RM and therefore did not issue wealth declarations? This section is based on the distribution of wealth among persons who owned more than 5,000 RM. We assume that wealth was log-normally distributed and complete the graph of the distribution for the missing 77 percent. This poorer part of the population owned about 2,000 RM per capita and altogether only 12 percent of overall Jewish wealth. 4. Which degree of inequality can be found within the Jewish population of Vienna in 1938? The estimation of the Gini coefficient for the whole Jewish population is based on the estimated log-normal distribution mentioned in section 3 and is estimated directly using the standard deviation. 5. Which factors determined overall wealth in the Jewish population? In this section, gender, age, marriage status, religious affiliation, education, profession and residential district are used as factors for the overall wealth status. In this section the analysis is confined to wealth owners with more than 5,000 RM. This research was financed by the Historical Commission of the Republic of Austria and is part of the Commission’s research program on expropriation during the Nazi period and restitution after 1945."