IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/13031.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development, disparity and colonial shocks: do endowments matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Idrees Khawaja

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

Abstract

"The province of Punjab – home to 56 percent of Pakistan’s population, is marked by regional disparity. This paper argues that the socioeconomic disparity observed today between the South-West of Punjab and the rest of the Province is largely owed to the historical differences in regional endowments. During the colonial rule over India, the North and Center of the province benefitted from Canals, Cantonments (military garrisons) and enlistment in the Indian army to fight on the side of the Britain in the two world wars. These shocks rested upon endowments unique to the two regions. The barren but cultivable land and sparse population of the Center facilitated canal colonization. The geo-strategic location of the North allowed the establishment of military headquarters and smaller garrisons in the region. The hardy men of the North, experienced in warfare since the 12th century, were suitable for the army. The South-West of the Punjab lacking the endowments of interest to the British, failed to benefit. Hence, the socioeconomic disparity observed today. "

Suggested Citation

  • Idrees Khawaja, 2013. "Development, disparity and colonial shocks: do endowments matter?," Working Papers 13031, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:13031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/57da6dc7-7094-4ef1-8ad1-ee70388ab2aa.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:13031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.