IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/86955.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Kananura, Rornald Muhumuza
  • Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
  • Paina, Ligia
  • Bumba, Ahmed
  • Mulekwa, Godfrey
  • Nakiganda-Busiku, Dinah
  • Oo, Htet Nay Lin
  • Kiwanuka, Suzanne Namusoke
  • George, Asha
  • Peters, David H.

Abstract

Background: The use of participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approaches is important for guiding local decision-making, promoting the implementation of effective interventions and addressing emerging issues in the course of implementation. In this article, we explore how participatory M&E approaches helped to identify key design and implementation issues and how they influenced stakeholders’ decision-making in eastern Uganda. Method: The data for this paper is drawn from a retrospective reflection of various M&E approaches used in a maternal and newborn health project that was implemented in three districts in eastern Uganda. The methods included qualitative and quantitative M&E techniques such as key informant interviews, formal surveys and supportive supervision, as well as participatory approaches, notably participatory impact pathway analysis. Results: At the design stage, the M&E approaches were useful for identifying key local problems and feasible local solutions and informing the activities that were subsequently implemented. During the implementation phase, the M&E approaches provided evidence that informed decision-making and helped identify emerging issues, such as weak implementation by some village health teams, health facility constraints such as poor use of standard guidelines, lack of placenta disposal pits, inadequate fuel for the ambulance at some facilities, and poor care for low birth weight infants. Sharing this information with key stakeholders prompted them to take appropriate actions. For example, the sub-county leadership constructed placenta disposal pits, the district health officer provided fuel for ambulances, and health workers received refresher training and mentorship on how to care for newborns. Conclusion: Diverse sources of information and perspectives can help researchers and decision-makers understand and adapt evidence to contexts for more effective interventions. Supporting districts to have crosscutting, routine information generating and sharing platforms that bring together stakeholders from different sectors is therefore crucial for the successful implementation of complex development interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kananura, Rornald Muhumuza & Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth & Paina, Ligia & Bumba, Ahmed & Mulekwa, Godfrey & Nakiganda-Busiku, Dinah & Oo, Htet Nay Lin & Kiwanuka, Suzanne Namusoke & George, Asha & Pete, 2017. "Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86955, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:86955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86955/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Participatory monitoring and evaluation; Implementation research; maternal and newborn health; Decision-making; Stakeholders;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:86955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.