IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/60793.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Peer support in mental health care: is it good value for money?

Author

Listed:
  • Trachtenberg, Marija
  • Parsonage, Michael
  • Shepherd, Geoff
  • Boardman, Jed

Abstract

Peer support workers - people with their own lived experience of mental illness - provide mutually supportive relationships in secondary mental health services. Increasing numbers are being employed, both in this country and elsewhere. But good quality evidence on the effectiveness of this form of service delivery is in short supply and even less is known about its cost-effectiveness. This paper makes a first attempt at assessing whether peer support provides value for money, looking specifically at whether peer support workers can reduce psychiatric inpatient bed use. Because of the very high cost of inpatient care, the savings that result from even small changes in bed use may be sufficient to outweigh the costs of employing peer workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Trachtenberg, Marija & Parsonage, Michael & Shepherd, Geoff & Boardman, Jed, 2013. "Peer support in mental health care: is it good value for money?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60793, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:60793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60793/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon, Phyllis & Draine, Jeffrey, 1995. "One-year outcomes of a randomized trial of consumer case management," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samson Tse & Emily WS Tsoi & Bridget Hamilton & Mary O’Hagan & Geoff Shepherd & Mike Slade & Rob Whitley & Melissa Petrakis, 2016. "Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(3), pages 281-291, May.
    2. Eilish M Burke & Melissa Pyle & Karen Machin & Anthony P Morrison, 2018. "Providing mental health peer support 1: A Delphi study to develop consensus on the essential components, costs, benefits, barriers and facilitators," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(8), pages 799-812, December.
    3. Knapp, Martin & Andrew, Alison & McDaid, David & Iemmi, Valentina & McCrone, Paul & Park, A-La & Parsonage, Michael & Boardman, Jed & Shepherd, Geoff, 2014. "Investing in recovery: making the business case for effective interventions for people with schizophrenia and psychosis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56773, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Hillary A. Robertson & Matthew G. Biel & Katherine R. Hayes & Sara Snowden & Latisha Curtis & Dominique Charlot-Swilley & Elyssa S. Clauson & Arrealia Gavins & Caslin M. Sisk & Noel Bravo & Erica E. C, 2023. "Leveraging the Expertise of the Community: A Case for Expansion of a Peer Workforce in Child, Adolescent, and Family Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather Menzies Munthe‐Kaas & Rigmor C Berg & Nora Blaasvær, 2018. "Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-281.
    2. Ganesh Kumar & Mamta Sood & Rohit Verma & Ananya Mahapatra & Rakesh Kumar Chadda, 2019. "Family caregivers’ needs of young patients with first episode psychosis: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(5), pages 435-442, August.
    3. Anna Price & Siân de Bell & Naomi Shaw & Alison Bethel & Rob Anderson & Jo Thompson Coon, 2022. "What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    4. DeMatteo, David & LaDuke, Casey & Locklair, Benjamin R. & Heilbrun, Kirk, 2013. "Community-based alternatives for justice-involved individuals with severe mental illness: Diversion, problem-solving courts, and reentry," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 64-71.
    5. Roger M. K. Ng & Veronica Pearson & Yin Wan Pang & N. S. Wong & N. C. Wong & F. M. Chan, 2013. "The uncut jade: Differing views of the potential of expert users on staff training and rehabilitation programmes for service users in Hong Kong," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(2), pages 176-187, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:60793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.