IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/29193.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reading Freire's words: are Freire's ideas applicable to Southern NGOs?

Author

Listed:
  • Mazzer Barroso, Mônica

Abstract

This paper responds both to the revival of interest in Paolo Freire's ideas and the comparatively little academic attention given to the applicability of Freirian thought to the activities of Southern Non-Governmental Organisations (SNGOs). It identifies the opportunities and challenges of applying Freire's ideas about community empowerment and participation to SNGOs' discourse and practice. Based on short case studies of three Freirian-oriented Brazilian NGOs, as well as on analysis of Freire's central thematic concerns in education (conscientização, praxis and dialogue), this paper identifies certain NGO management contradictions and tendencies that have so far received little attention in the literature. These are: (i) the ongoing tension between political and service delivery roles; (ii) the usefulness of Freire's ideas for SNGOs in contexts where 'class harmony' rather than 'class struggle' is emphasised; and (iii) whether there is an under-realised potential contribution that Freire's work can make to SNGOs. The paper concludes that SNGO theorists and practitioners need to be clear about the opportunities and challenges inherent to Freire's concepts if they are to be useful in this context. Only if wisely interpreted and translated, can the Freirian philosophy enable SNGOs to become successful and consistent learning organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mazzer Barroso, Mônica, 2002. "Reading Freire's words: are Freire's ideas applicable to Southern NGOs?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29193, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:29193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29193/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serene Khader, 2009. "Adaptive Preferences and Procedural Autonomy," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 169-187.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:29193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.