IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/125392.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade-gender alignment of international trade agreements: insufficiencies and improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Chi, Manjiao
  • Yin, Zhiyuan

Abstract

There is a growing call for gender equality in international trade. Enhancing trade-gender alignment of international trade agreements (ITAs) is a major way to make ITAs gender-responsive. In recent years, an increasing number of gender provisions have been incorporated in ITAs, which can be roughly categorized in four major types from normative perspective: declaratory, aspirational, obligatory, and exceptive. While these provisions help draw attention to gender issues associated with international trade and investment, their normativity, enforceability and effectiveness remain at an insufficient level in general. Given the sensitivity and complexity of gender issues in many states, it seems unrealistic and undesirable to transform ITAs into a major discourse for states to address gender concerns, but it still makes sense to enhance trade-gender alignment of ITAs. This impliedly calls for incorporating larger number and more types of gender provisions in ITAs, enhancing their normativity and enforceability through suitable means, and harmonizing national gender laws and ITA gender provisions to create synergies for pursuing gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi, Manjiao & Yin, Zhiyuan, 2024. "Trade-gender alignment of international trade agreements: insufficiencies and improvements," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:125392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/125392/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    compliance; gender equality; gender-trade alignment; international trade agreements; normativity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:125392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.