IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/121614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investor reactions to crypto token regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Koenraadt, Jeroen
  • Leung, Edith

Abstract

Despite calls for regulation in the crypto utility token market, it is unclear how crypto tokeninvestors value current regulatory proposals. We find that on average, investors react negatively to news thatincreases the likelihood of securities and transparency-related regulation. We also find that this negativereaction is attenuated for tokens rated higher on quality and transparency by intermediaries, those thathave higher levels of disclosure, and listed on more liquid exchanges. The observed variation in tokentransparency and this muted reaction suggest investors perceive disclosure costs to be lower for tokens inmore transparent environments, suggesting that transparency matters to investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Koenraadt, Jeroen & Leung, Edith, 2022. "Investor reactions to crypto token regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121614, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/121614/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Greenstone & Paul Oyer & Annette Vissing-Jorgensen, 2006. "Mandated Disclosure, Stock Returns, and the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 399-460.
    2. Zhang, Ivy Xiying, 2007. "Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 74-115, September.
    3. Anat R. Admati, Paul Pfleiderer, 1988. "A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 3-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Pengcheng & Xu, Kunpeng & Qi, Jiayin, 2023. "The impact of regulation on cryptocurrency market volatility in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 222-246.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kun Wang & Zhe Wei & Xing Xiao & Kunpeng Sun, 2020. "Security regulations, access to capital markets, and firm performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 1034-1058, July.
    2. Han, Bing & Tang, Ya & Yang, Liyan, 2016. "Public information and uninformed trading: Implications for market liquidity and price efficiency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 604-643.
    3. Fernandes, Nuno & Lel, Ugur & Miller, Darius P., 2010. "Escape from New York: The market impact of loosening disclosure requirements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 129-147, February.
    4. Hao, Jinji, 2024. "Disclosure regulation, cost of capital, and firm values," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1).
    5. Belén Díaz Díaz & Rebeca García‐Ramos & Myriam García Olalla, 2020. "Does regulating remuneration affect the market value of European Union banks? Large versus small/medium sized banks," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 150-164, January.
    6. Christensen, Hans B. & Hail, Luzi & Leuz, Christian, 2010. "Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: The Role of Implementation and Enforcement," Working Papers 241, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    7. Fang, Junxiong & Shi, Haina & Xu, Haoping, 2012. "The determinants and consequences of IPOs in a regulated economy: Evidence from China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 131-150.
    8. Akhigbe, Aigbe & Martin, Anna D. & Nishikawa, Takeshi, 2009. "Changes in risk of foreign firms listed in the U.S. following Sarbanes-Oxley," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-205, July.
    9. Dhammika Dharmapala, 2016. "Estimating the Compliance Costs of Securities Regulation: A Bunching Analysis of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b)," CESifo Working Paper Series 6180, CESifo.
    10. Stefan Arping & Zacharias Sautner, 2013. "Did SOX Section 404 Make Firms Less Opaque? Evidence from Cross†Listed Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1133-1165, September.
    11. Durnev, Art & Li, TieMei & Magnan, Michel, 2016. "Are offshore firms worth more?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 131-156.
    12. Aigbe Akhigbe & Anna D. Martin & Melinda L. Newman, 2010. "Information Asymmetry Determinants of Sarbanes‐Oxley Wealth Effects," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 39(3), pages 1253-1272, September.
    13. Belén Díaz Díaz & Rebeca García-Ramos & Myriam García-Olalla, 2017. "Shareholder wealth responses to European legislation on bank executive compensation," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 271-291, July.
    14. Nejadmalayeri, Ali & Nishikawa, Takeshi & Rao, Ramesh P., 2013. "Sarbanes-Oxley Act and corporate credit spreads," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2991-3006.
    15. Min, Byung-Seong, 2013. "Evaluation of board reforms: An examination of the appointment of outside directors," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 21-43.
    16. Bessembinder, Hendrik & Carrion, Allen & Tuttle, Laura & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2016. "Liquidity, resiliency and market quality around predictable trades: Theory and evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 142-166.
    17. Waters, James, 2015. "Optimal design and consequences of financial disclosure regulation: a real options approach," MPRA Paper 63369, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Chang, Sanders S. & Wang, F. Albert, 2015. "Adverse selection and the presence of informed trading," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 19-33.
    19. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Cox, Justin & Upson, James E., 2022. "Tick Size Pilot Program and price discovery in U.S. stock markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    20. Goldstein, Itay & Yang, Liyan, 2019. "Good disclosure, bad disclosure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 118-138.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulation; transparency; cryptocurrencies; financial markets; crypto tokens;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.