IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/121553.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Conservative governments’ record on social security: policies, spending and outcomes, May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Cooper, Kerris
  • Hills, John

Abstract

This paper uses the Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes framework to evaluate how social security policies evolved, how public spending changed, the effects of these on the generosity of the system, and evidence of key outcomes in the areas that social security is intended to address, as well as evidence related to one of the main structural reforms to social security in the last decade – the rollout of Universal Credit. The main focus is on the period of the Conservative governments from 2015 until 2019, but this is set in the context of their legacies from the preceding Labour and Coalition governments and is concluded by looking at the challenges the system already faced in the 2020s before the Coronavirus crisis. Within ‘social security’ the paper covers spending on cash benefits run by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and tax credits that have been run by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), including payments for those above as well as below pension age. The analysis tells the story of why the social security system in place on the eve of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020 took the form that it did, and of how well-placed it was to cope with what turned out to be the greatest shock to British living standards since the Second World War.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooper, Kerris & Hills, John, 2021. "The Conservative governments’ record on social security: policies, spending and outcomes, May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121553, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/121553/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obolenskaya, Polina & Hills, John, 2019. "Flat-lining or seething beneath the surface: two decades of changing economic inequality in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100287, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. De Agostini, Paula & Hills, John & Sutherland, Holly, 2018. "Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the 2010-2015 UK Coalition government's tax-benefit policy changes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Polina Obolenskaya & John Hills, 2019. "Flat-lining or seething beneath the surface? Two decades of changing economic inequality in the UK," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 04, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Kitty Stewart & Nick Roberts, 2019. "Child Poverty Measurement in the UK: Assessing Support for the Downgrading of Income-Based Poverty Measures," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 523-542, April.
    5. repec:cep:spccrr:spdorp03 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kitty Stewart & Kerris Cooper & Isabel Shutes, 2019. "What does Brexit mean for social policy in the UK? An exploration of the potential consequences of the 2016 referendum for public services, inequalities and social rights," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 03, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Cribb, Jonathan & Emmerson, Carl, 2019. "Can't wait to get my pension: the effect of raising the female early retirement age on income, poverty and deprivation," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 450-472, July.
    8. Summers, Kate & Young, David, 2020. "Universal simplicity? The alleged simplicity of Universal Credit from administrative and claimant perspectives," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105032, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Obolenskaya, Polina & Hills, John, 2019. "Flat-lining or seething beneath the surface?: two decades of changing economic inequality in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101128, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Polina Obolenskaya & John Hills, 2019. "Flat-lining or seething beneath the surface? Two decades of changing economic inequality in the UK," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 467-489.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerris Cooper & John Hills, 2021. "The Conservative Governments’ Record on Social Security: Policies, Spending and Outcomes, May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 10, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. repec:cep:spccrp:08 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mari, Gabriele & Keizer, Renske, 2020. "Families of Austerity: Welfare Cuts and Family Stress in Britain," SocArXiv vdej8, Center for Open Science.
    4. Iva Valentinova Tasseva, 2021. "The Changing Education Distribution and Income Inequality in Great Britain," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(3), pages 659-683, September.
    5. repec:cep:spccrp:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Edmiston, Daniel & Robertshaw, David & Young, David & Ingold, Jo & Gibbons, Andrea & Summers, Kate & Scullion, Lisa & Geiger, Ben Baumberg & de Vries, Robert, 2022. "Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113829, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Mike Brewer & Iva Valentinova Tasseva, 2021. "Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(3), pages 433-458, September.
    8. repec:cep:spccrr:spdorp03 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ana Maria Nicoriciu & Mark Elliot, 2023. "Families of children with disabilities: income poverty, material deprivation, and unpaid care in the UK," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Stewart, Kitty & Reeves, Aaron & Patrick, Ruth, 2021. "A time of need: exploring the changing poverty risk facing larger families in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121530, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Kalwij, Adriaan & Kanabar, Ricky, 2022. "State Pension eligibility age and retirement behaviour: evidence from the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study," ISER Working Paper Series 2022-05, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Andersen, Asbjørn Goul & Markussen, Simen & Røed, Knut, 2021. "Pension reform and the efficiency-equity trade-off: Impacts of removing an early retirement subsidy," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Orton, Michael & Summers, Kate & Morris, Rosa, 2022. "Guiding principles for social security policy: outcomes from a bottom-up approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113617, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Alessandro Cusimano & Chiara Paola Donegani & Stephen McKay, 2022. "Later pensions, lower social capital?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(4), pages 2150-2160.
    15. Stewart, Kitty & Reader, Mary, 2021. "The Conservative governments' record on early childhood from May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020: policies, spending and outcomes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121552, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Ruth Patrick & Aaron Reeves & Kitty Stewart, 2021. "A time of need: Exploring the changing poverty risk facing larger families in the UK," CASE Papers /224, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    17. Bramley, Glen & Burchardt, Tania & Cooper, Kerris & Fitzpatrick, Suzanne & Hills, John & Hughes, Jarrod & Lacey, Nicola & Lupton, Ruth & Macmillan, Lindsey & McKnight, Abigail & Obolenskaya, Polina & , 2023. "The Conservative Governments’ record on social policy from May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020: policies, spending and outcomes. An assessment of social policies and social inequalities on the eve of the COVID," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120486, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Ingrid Robeyns & Vincent Buskens & Arnout Rijt & Nina Vergeldt & Tanja Lippe, 2021. "How Rich is Too Rich? Measuring the Riches Line," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 115-143, February.
    19. Vanesa Jorda & Jose M. Alonso, 2020. "What works to mitigate and reduce relative (and absolute) inequality?: A systematic review," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-152, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. McKnight, Abigail & Cooper, Kerris, 2022. "The Conservative governments’ record on employment: policies, spending and outcomes, May 2015 to pre-COVID 2020," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121555, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Giusta, Marina Della & Longhi, Simonetta, 2021. "Stung by pension reforms: The unequal impact of changes in state pension age on UK women and their partners," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    22. Valery P. Chichkanov & Elena V. Chistova & Alexander N. Tyrsin & Anatoly N. Stepanov, 2019. "Consequences of Raising The Retirement Age for the Labor Market in the Regions of Russia," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(1), pages 31-45.
    23. Gorlin, Yury & Kartseva, Marina & Lyashok, Victor, 2019. "The impact of the retirement age increase on the poverty level of the Russian population: Microsimulation analysis," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 54, pages 26-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social security; poverty; inequality; universal credit; pensions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.