IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/112951.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Notes on the Exponential Random Graph Model: a contribution to the critique of interdisciplinarity

Author

Listed:
  • Dini, Paolo

Abstract

A tutorial discussion is presented about the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) of Social Network Analysis (SNA). The intended audience is post-graduate students and researchers in social science who are curious to understand better where quantitative models come from, for a more effective integration with qualitative methodologies. The discussion is traced back to Jaynes’s distinction between objective and subjective interpretations of probability, where the former emphasizes likelihood of outcomes based on frequency distributions, while the latter emphasizes our incomplete knowledge or uncertainty about the outcome. Although within information theory both views lead to the same functional form for information entropy, when applying these concepts to graph theory the paper shows that the subjective view leads to the ERGM, while the objective view yields a different functional form for the ‘graph entropy’. It is hoped that the critical perspective on interdisciplinarity developed throughout the paper lends credibility and insight to the conclusion that the subjective view of graph entropy is justified as an optimization principle for the most likely distribution of different graph metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Dini, Paolo, 2021. "Notes on the Exponential Random Graph Model: a contribution to the critique of interdisciplinarity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112951, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112951/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.