IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/101458.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of capacity-building strategies for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, policymakers and planners, and researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Evans-Lacko, Sara
  • Hanlon, Charlotte
  • Alem, Atalay
  • Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis
  • Chisholm, Dan
  • Gureje, Oye
  • Jordans, Mark
  • Kigozi, Fred
  • Lempp, Heidi
  • Lund, Crick
  • Petersen, Inge
  • Shidhaye, Rahul
  • Thornicroft, Graham
  • Semrau, Maya

Abstract

BackgroundStrengthening of mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires the involvement of appropriately skilled and committed individuals from a range of stakeholder groups. Currently, few evidence-based capacity-building activities and materials are available to enable and sustain comprehensive improvements.AimsWithin the Emerald project, the goal of this study was to evaluate capacity-building activities for three target groups: (a) service users with mental health conditions and their caregivers; (b) policymakers and planners; and (c) mental health researchers.MethodWe developed and tailored three short courses (between 1 and 5 days long). We then implemented and evaluated these short courses on 24 different occasions. We assessed satisfaction among 527 course participants as well as pre–post changes in knowledge in six LMICs (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda). Changes in research capacity of partner Emerald institutions was also assessed through monitoring of academic outputs of participating researchers and students and via anonymous surveys.ResultsShort courses were associated with high levels of satisfaction and led to improvements in knowledge across target groups. In relation to institutional capacity building, all partner institutions reported improvements in research capacity for most aspects of mental health system strengthening and global mental health, and many of these positive changes were attributed to the Emerald programme. In terms of outputs, eight PhD students submitted a total of 10 papers relating to their PhD work (range 0–4) and were involved in 14 grant applications, of which 43% (n = 6) were successful.ConclusionsThe Emerald project has shown that building capacity of key stakeholders in mental health system strengthening is possible. However, the starting point and appropriate strategies for this may vary across different countries, depending on the local context, needs and resources.Declaration of interestS.E.L. received consulting fees from Lundbeck.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans-Lacko, Sara & Hanlon, Charlotte & Alem, Atalay & Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis & Chisholm, Dan & Gureje, Oye & Jordans, Mark & Kigozi, Fred & Lempp, Heidi & Lund, Crick & Petersen, Inge & Shidhaye, Ra, 2019. "Evaluation of capacity-building strategies for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, policymakers and planners, and researchers," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101458, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:101458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101458/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Low- and middle-income countries; mental health systems; capacity-building; mental health;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:101458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.