IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/een/camaaa/2024-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Re-Examining What We Can Learn About Counterfactual Results from Time Series Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Ippei Fujiwara
  • Adrian Pagan

Abstract

McKay and Wolf (2023) describe a method for ï¬ nding counterfactuals which only requires that one know the impulse responses of shocks from a baseline structural model generating the data. A key feature in their work is the use of news shocks. This an elegant piece of theory and they indicate it can be applied empirically. We argue that one cannot recover the impulse responses from data generated by the structural model when there are news shocks as there are more shocks than observables in that case. We investigate an alternative proposal whereby some off model variables are used to ï¬ nd the requisite impulse responses and ï¬ nd that there are issues with doing that. Their theoretical result also relies upon the baseline structural model only having monetary policy operating via the interest rate channel so it excludes models that might be thought relevant for capturing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ippei Fujiwara & Adrian Pagan, 2024. "Re-Examining What We Can Learn About Counterfactual Results from Time Series Regression," CAMA Working Papers 2024-44, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2024-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication/cama_crawford_anu_edu_au/2024-06/44_2024_fujiwara_pagan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    counterfactual; news shocks; shock recovery; local projection;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • E3 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2024-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cama Admin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.