IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col033/41586.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing opportunities for enhanced integration of the associate members of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander, Dale
  • Corbin, Carlyle

Abstract

As a preliminary phase of action in response to the ECLAC resolution which calls for greater inclusion of the associate members in the work of the Commission, this study sought to accomplish three outcomes. Firstly, the study explored the common development challenges of the non-sovereign associate members (AMs) of ECLAC which served as impediments to the economic and social development of the AMs, and identified priorities which fostered and advanced their development aspirations. Secondly, in light of the recent incremental changes in the political status that had occurred in many of those territories, affording them greater autonomy and freedom to independently engage with regional neighbours on issues of common interest, the study mapped strategic options that were available to enhance their level of integration with regional and international organizations active in the Caribbean subregion. Moreover, the study documented the development mechanisms that could be leveraged to facilitate the continued development of the AMs, and proposed opportunities for enhanced collaboration through South-South cooperation and other collaborative mechanisms with neighbouring member States. Finally, while acknowledging that the AMs shared common needs, including challenges related to climate change and natural hazard vulnerability, heavy reliance on fossil fuel, and limited institutional capacity, the study recognized that their individual circumstances were unique. In that regard, the recommended actions took that into account, exploring options for the design of a strategy of programme support to accelerate their economic and social progress. Importantly, the study identified opportunities to further integrate the AMs into ECLAC’s programmes of development support.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander, Dale & Corbin, Carlyle, 2017. "Assessing opportunities for enhanced integration of the associate members of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 41586, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col033:41586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/41586
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 2007. "A plan of action for the further integration of associate member countries in the United Nations system including its specialized agencies in the economic and social sphere," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38539, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Anon, 2002. "The Economy of Influence," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1331-1332, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercy W. Mwangi & Amos G. Njuguna & George O. Achoki, 2019. "Relationship between corruption and capital flight in Kenya: 1998-2018," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(5), pages 237-250, September.
    2. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-026-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Panagiotis Artelaris & Yannis Tsirbas, 2018. "Anti-austerity voting in an era of economic crisis: Regional evidence from the 2015 referendum in Greece," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 589-608, June.
    4. Christian Salas, 2019. "Persuading policy-makers," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(4), pages 507-542, October.
    5. Luigi Guiso & Michael Haliassos & Tullio Jappelli, 2003. "Household stockholding in Europe: where do we stand and where do we go? [‘Limited market participation and volatility of assets prices’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 18(36), pages 123-170.
    6. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Tokunaga, Masahiro, 2020. "Regime Change and Environmental Reform: A Systematic Review of Research on Central and Eastern Europe," CEI Working Paper Series 2019-10, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    8. Ikudayisi, Adesola & Okoruwa, Victor O., 2021. "Urban Differential Effects on Food Demand in Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315142, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2023. "Cobweb Theory, Market Stability, And Price Expectations," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 137-161, March.
    10. Jeffrey Wagner, 2007. "Plato's Republic and liberal economic education for the twenty-first century," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10.
    11. Shaoxiong Yang & Jinfu Xu & Ruoyu Yang, 2020. "Research on Coordination and Driving Factors of Sports Industry and Regional Sustainable Development—Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of Provinces and Cities in Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Elinder, Mikael & Jordahl, Henrik, 2013. "Political preferences and public sector outsourcing," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 43-57.
    13. Sudhir K. Thakur, 2008. "Identification of Regional Fundamental Economic Structure (FES) of India: An Input-Output and Field of Influence Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-59, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. De Pinto, A., 2018. "The Global Effects of Widespread Adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277524, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. André Roncaglia de Carvalho & Carlos Eduardo Suprinyak, 2022. "An emigrant economist in the tropics: Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen on Brazilian inflation and development," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(3), pages 561-579.
    16. Sidonia von Ledebur, 2009. "University-owned Patents in West and East Germany and the Abolition of the Professors' Privilege," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2009-02, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    17. Oleh Holovko & Ihor Biriukov, 2020. "Reasons And Consequences Of Hidden Entrepreneurship In Ukraine," Three Seas Economic Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 1(2).
    18. Marianne Bertrand & Matilde Bombardini & Francesco Trebbi, 2014. "Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(12), pages 3885-3920, December.
    19. Yong-Ju Lee, 2011. "A Game-Theoretic Explanation on Legislative Inefficiency in Korea," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 27, pages 293-309.
    20. Joan Esteban & Debraj Ray, 2006. "Inequality, Lobbying, and Resource Allocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 257-279, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col033:41586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.