IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col022/3535.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic efficiency of free and open source software in the public sector: the example of Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Sax, Matthias

Abstract

This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of free and open source software (FOSS) in the public sector. It is based on a survey conducted in late 2004 with the informatics community of the government of Chile, which represents the key IT decision-makers in the Chilean public sector. The survey identified criteria that affect successful deployment and usage of FOSS. The balanced scorecard was used as a basic approach for identifying the strategic IT priorities and objectives of Chilean public institutions. In addition to the survey, respondents were interviewed to make out possible positive and negative effects on the strategic objectives due to the use of FOSS. The results show that also FOSS is still backward in terms of functionality and user friendliness in comparison with closed source software, it offers various strategic advantages like higher security and transparency which are very important especially in the public sector. Due to these advantages, FOSS can compensate or even outperform still existing disadvantages. It has to be annotated that these disadvantages are often only a matter of time, until motivated members of the worldwide FOSS community eliminate them. When interviewing the IT specialists of the public sector in Chile, a very enthusiastic, open-minded and also motivated attitude towards the application of free and open source software could be perceived. However, in the majority of cases there is not enough time or resources to concentrate on doing feasibility investigations for FOSS in the institutions. Some further conclusions include that software piracy is serious jeopardy for the further development of FOSS, especially in developing countries. Due to lock-in effects, it can be that end-users even do not get the possibility to discover FOSS or even take the chance to join FOSS projects. It is also very important that governments manifest their opinion related to the current FOSS debate. The role of software patents needs to be demystified and advantages and disadvantages related to transparency, lock-in, public property and innovation need to be discussed objectively. The public sector of an information society needs to take position and formulate clear statements regards eventual trade-offs for the future. This publication is a contribution to this process in Latin America and the Caribbean, based on the call for research made in Goal 8 of the Regional Action Plan for the Information Society, eLAC2007 (http://www.ecalc.org/SocInfo/eLAC).""

Suggested Citation

  • Sax, Matthias, 2006. "Economic efficiency of free and open source software in the public sector: the example of Chile," Documentos de Proyectos 3535, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col022:3535
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/3535
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefano Comino & Fabio M. Manenti, 2003. "Open Source vs Closed Source Software: Public Policies in the Software Market," Industrial Organization 0306001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Nicolas Jullien & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2006. "New Approaches to Intellectual Protection: From Open Software to Knowledge-based Industrial Activities," Chapters, in: Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Jullien & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2011. "FLOSS in an industrial economics perspective," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 39-64.
    2. Nicolas Jullien & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2011. "Floss firms, users and communities: a viable match?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 31-53.
    3. Raasch, Christina & Lee, Viktor & Spaeth, Sebastian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2013. "The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: The case of open source innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1138-1151.
    4. Miralles, Francesc & Sieber, Sandra & Valor, Josep, 2005. "CIO herds and user gangs in the adoption of open source software," IESE Research Papers D/595, IESE Business School.
    5. Evangelos Katsamakas & Mingdi Xin, 2005. "An economic analysis of enterprise adoption of open source software," Working Papers 05-29, NET Institute, revised Oct 2005.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col022:3535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.