IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/wc2000/1151.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Decision to Seek or Be Sought

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothea K. Herreiner

    (University of Bonn)

Abstract

A one-shot market with two sides is considered where everybody can be matched with at most one person. Individuals have to find trading partners on their own. Whether searching or waiting is the optimal strategy is the central question of this paper. In a market where searching and waiting are done exclusively by one market side, it is more efficient if the long market side searches. In a market where on both sides some individuals search and others stay put, there are also mixed equilibria which are even more efficient. The matching friction due to uncoordinated search by individuals implies that larger market are in general less efficient than a collection of smaller markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothea K. Herreiner, 2000. "The Decision to Seek or Be Sought," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1151, Econometric Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/es2000/1151.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klaus Kultti & Antti Miettunen & Tuomas Takalo & Juha Virrankoski, 2009. "Who Searches?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 152-171, June.
    2. Klaus Kultti & Antti Miettunen & Juha Virrankoski, 2006. "Physical Search," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 223-244, December.
    3. Shouyong Shi & Alain Delacroix, 2018. "Should Buyers or Sellers Trade in a Frictional Market?," 2018 Meeting Papers 254, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Klaus Kultti, 2003. "About Market Structure," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 6(1), pages 240-251, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.