IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/wc2000/0398.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation of Constrained Singular Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Haupt

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Walter Oberhofer

    (University of Regensburg)

Abstract

The topic of this paper is the problem of a singular disturbance covariance matrix in (seemingly unrelated) systems of linear regression equations. This singularity is considered as being caused by exact linear restrictions on the endogenous variables, adding-up to a predetermined aggregate. It is well known, that the estimation of such systems require the substitution of one equation by the "adding up condition" as proposed by Barten (1969), or, as alternatively proposed by Theil (1971), a modification of the GLS estimator. The consequently occuring question of the invariance of the parameter estimates to the choice of which equation is deleted has been discussed exhaustively by Powell (1969) for GLS and Barten (1969) for ML estimation. Dhrymes and Schwarz (1987a,b) pointed out the parallels between the different procedings and argued that the estimator of Theil (1971) fails to exist in most of the practically relevant constellations. The rank conditions given by Theil (1971) and the corresponding objections of Dhrymes and Schwarz (1987a,b) are substantially simplified and generalized. In the second section of this paper we introduce a general model, where we discuss all necessary preliminaries, assumptions and constraints and consider relevant model alternatives. Estimation topics are discussed in section three. In section four we derive less restrictive rank conditions than postulated by Theil (1971) in a more general framework as in the corresponding considerations of Dhrymes and Schwarz (1987a,b). The special case of identical regressors in every equation of the system and homoscedasticity is considererd in section five. Section six deals with the problem of the deletion choice. Strongly related to the work of Powell (1969) and Barten (1969) we show, that under consideration of the constraints, the estimator is invariant to the deletion choice and equivalent to the modified GLS estimator. In section seven we briefly discuss starting conditions for feasible GLS estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Haupt & Walter Oberhofer, 2000. "Estimation of Constrained Singular Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0398, Econometric Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:0398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/es2000/0398.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. BARTEN, Anton P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 34, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Barten, A. P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 7-73.
    3. G. D. N. Worswick & D. G. Champernowne, 1954. "A Note on the Adding-up Criterion," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 57-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana S. Cordis, 2014. "Corruption and the Composition of Public Spending in the United States," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(6), pages 745-773, November.
    2. Ignacio, Escañuela Romana, 2019. "The elasticities of passenger transport demand in the Northeast Corridor," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2002:i:1:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Haupt, Harry & Oberhofer, Walter, 2006. "Generalized adding-up in systems of regression equations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 263-269, August.
    5. Harry Haupt & Walter Oberhofer, 2002. "Fully restricted linear regression: A pedagogical note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paris, Quirino & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2012. "Quantity Versus Shares in Estimating Demand Systems," Working Papers 124575, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    3. Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. & Barten, Anton P., 1995. "Rejection without falsification on the history of testing the homogeneity condition in the theory of consumer demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 103-127, May.
    4. Laura Spierdijk & Sherrill Shaffer & Tim Considine, 2016. "Adapting to changing input prices in response to the crisis: The case of US commercial banks," CAMA Working Papers 2016-15, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "The Differential Approach to Demand Analysis and the Rotterdam Model," MPRA Paper 12319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. van Heeswijk, B J & de Boer, P M C & Harkema, R, 1993. "A Dynamic Specification of an AIDS Import Allocation Model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 57-73.
    7. Korir, Lilian & Rizov, Marian & Ruto, Eric, 2020. "Food security in Kenya: Insights from a household food demand model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 99-108.
    8. Moschini, G. & Moro, D., 1993. "A Food demand System for Canada," Papers 1-93, Gouvernement du Canada - Agriculture Canada.
    9. Seale, James L. & Solano, Alexis A., 2012. "The changing demand for energy in rich and poor countries over 25years," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1834-1844.
    10. Shawna Grosskopf & Kathy Hayes, 1983. "Do Local Governments Maximize Anything?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 202-216, April.
    11. Holt, Matthew T., 2002. "Inverse demand systems and choice of functional form," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 117-142, January.
    12. Huang, Tai-Hsin & Lin, Chung-I & Chen, Kuan-Chen, 2017. "Evaluating efficiencies of Chinese commercial banks in the context of stochastic multistage technologies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 93-110.
    13. Lila J. Truett & Dale B. Truett, 2003. "The Italian Automotive Industry and Economies of Scale," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(3), pages 329-337, July.
    14. Cockx, Bart & Ghirelli, Corinna, 2016. "Scars of recessions in a rigid labor market," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 162-176.
    15. David K. Foot & William J. Milne, 1989. "Multiregional Estimation of Gross Internal Migration Flows," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 29-43, April.
    16. Marc-Andreas Muendler & Sascha O. Becker, 2010. "Margins of Multinational Labor Substitution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1999-2030, December.
    17. S. Selvanathan, 1987. "How Similar are OECD Consumers?," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 87-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    18. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "New Varieties and the Returns to Commodity Promotion: Washington Fuji Apples," Working Papers 28541, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    19. E.A. Selvanathan, 1985. "The Demand for Alcohol in the U.K.: An econometric study," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 85-06, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    20. Henrik Hansen & Derek Headey, 2010. "The Short-Run Macroeconomic Impact of Foreign Aid to Small States: An Agnostic Time Series Analysis," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 877-896.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:0398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.