IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/feam04/493.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unilateral vs. cross licensing:A theory and new evidence on the firm-level determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Hyeog Ug Kwon
  • Sadao Nagaoka

Abstract

This paper examines the firm level determinants of the incidence of cross-licensing. It develops a simple stochastic theory explaining such incidence, and confirms its implications based on new dataset of licensing contracts by Japanese firms. Among major findings are: (1) Licensing probability has an almost linear relationship with the size of a potential licensor. (2) Cross-licensing is more prevalent between large and symmetric firms. (3) A licensing contract with only patents is more likely to involve cross-licensing than that with only trade secret. (4) A licensor is on the average larger than a licensee.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyeog Ug Kwon & Sadao Nagaoka, 2004. "Unilateral vs. cross licensing:A theory and new evidence on the firm-level determinants," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 493, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/esFEAM04/up.24847.1077345526.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cross-licensing licensing contracts patent;

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.