Author
Abstract
The rapidly growing number of lithium-ion battery packs deployed in electric vehicles (EVs) entails enormous economic potential for used EV batteries to be redeployed in a second life application, e.g., for behind-the-meter stationary energy storage. To examine this potential, we develop a generic economic valuation model for used capacity assets in which second life usage requires repurposing costs and delays the receipt of recycling payoffs. Our model estimates point to a robust economic case for repurposing battery packs with iron-based cathodes (LFP batteries). Specifically, we project that the fair market value of LFP batteries exiting from electric vehicles generally exceeds 40% of the market value of a new battery. The value retention shares of used LFP packs are substantially higher in the U.S. market than in China, owing to the fact that new batteries are traded at higher market prices in the U.S. In contrast, our findings point only to a marginal economic case for repurposing batteries with nickel-cobalt-based cathodes (NCX batteries) in the context of the U.S. market. This finding reflects the relatively large recycling payoffs available from nickel and cobalt as well as the relatively short life cycle of NCX cathodes. For the Chinese market, we obtain the unambiguous conclusion that owners of NCX batteries are better off not incurring the requisite repurposing costs but instead immediately collecting the available recycling payoff.
Suggested Citation
Bach, Amadeus & Onori, Simona & Reichelstein, Stefan J. & Zhuang, Jihan, 2024.
"Fair Market Valuation of Electric Vehicle Batteries in Second Life Applications,"
Research Papers
4203, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
Handle:
RePEc:ecl:stabus:4203
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.