IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/4190.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Heterogeneous Impact of Changes in Default Gift Amounts on Fundraising

Author

Listed:
  • Athey, Susan

    (Stanford U)

  • Byambadalai, Undral

    (CyberAgent, Inc)

  • Cersosimo, Matias

    (Instacart)

  • Koutout, Kristine

    (Stanford U)

  • Nath, Shanjukta

    (U of Georgia)

Abstract

When choosing whether and how much to donate, potential donors often observe a set of default donation amounts known as an “ask string.†In an experiment with more than 400,000 PayPal users, we replace a relatively unused donation amount ($75) on PayPal’s Giving Fund Website ask string with either a lower ($10) or a higher ($200) reference point to evaluate the impact on charitable giving. Relative to the status quo, we find that a higher reference point increases the total amount of money raised, while the lower reference point increases the number of donors, two objectives important to non-profits. Both interventions drive more people to choose a default amount compared to the status quo, where the alternatives are not donating or writing in an amount. Examining treatment effect heterogeneity and changes in the distribution of donations, we provide suggestive evidence about the mechanisms. We use data-driven machine learning methods to learn personalized policies that identify who should be shown the lower versus higher reference point. Personalization can increase the probability of choosing a default amount, and it can also alleviate the trade-off to non-profits between the total amount of money raised and the number of donors.

Suggested Citation

  • Athey, Susan & Byambadalai, Undral & Cersosimo, Matias & Koutout, Kristine & Nath, Shanjukta, 2024. "The Heterogeneous Impact of Changes in Default Gift Amounts on Fundraising," Research Papers 4190, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/heterogeneous-impact-changes-default-gift-amounts-fundraising
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.