IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pressed for Time? Goal Conflict Shapes How Time Is Perceived, Spent, and Valued

Author

Listed:
  • Etkin, Jordan

    (Duke University)

  • Evangelidis, Ioannis

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Aaker, Jennifer

    (Knight Management Center, Stanford University)

Abstract

Consumers often feel pressed for time, but why? This research provides a novel answer to this question: subjective perceptions of goal conflict. We show that beyond the number of goals competing for their time, perceived conflict between goals makes consumers feel that they have less time. Five experiments demonstrate that perceiving greater conflict between goals makes people feel time constrained, driven by increased stress and anxiety. These effects, which generalize across a variety of goals and types of conflict both related and unrelated to demands on time, impact how consumers spend time as well as how much they are willing to pay to save time. We identify two simple interventions that can help consumers mitigate goal conflict's negative effects: slow breathing and anxiety reappraisal. Together our findings shed light on what drives how consumers see, spend, and value their time.

Suggested Citation

  • Etkin, Jordan & Evangelidis, Ioannis & Aaker, Jennifer, 2014. "Pressed for Time? Goal Conflict Shapes How Time Is Perceived, Spent, and Valued," Research Papers 3247, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/pressed-time-goal-conflict-shapes-how-time-perceived-spent-valued
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.