IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1753r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Complementary Justice: Effects of "Poor But Happy" and "Poor But Honest" Stereotype Exemplars on System Justification and Implicit Activation of the Justice Motive

Author

Listed:
  • Kay, Aaron C.

    (Stanford U)

  • Jost, John T.

    (Stanford U)

Abstract

In an integration of just world and system justification theories, it was hypothesized that exposure to complementary representations of the poor as happier and more honest than the rich would satisfy the justice motive and lead to an increase in support for the status quo. This hypothesis was corroborated in four experimental studies. In Study 1, it was demonstrated that exposure to "poor but happy" and "rich but miserable" stereotype exemplars led people to score higher on a general measure of system justification (SJ), compared to people who were exposed to non-complementary exemplars. Study 2 replicated this effect with "poor but honest" and "rich but dishonest" complementary stereotypes. In Studies 3 and 4, we found that exposure to non-complementary stereotype exemplars implicitly activated justice concerns, as indicated by faster reaction times to justice-related than neutral words in a lexical decision task. We also found that Protestant Work Ethic (PWE) moderated the effects of stereotype exposure on explicit SJ (but not implicit activation). The "poor but happy" exemplar was more effective at increasing SJ for people who scored low in PWE, whereas the "poor but honest" exemplar was more effective at increasing SJ for people who scored high in PWE.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay, Aaron C. & Jost, John T., 2003. "Complementary Justice: Effects of "Poor But Happy" and "Poor But Honest" Stereotype Exemplars on System Justification and Implicit Activation of the Justice Motive," Research Papers 1753r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1753r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1753R.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jost, John T. & Kay, Aaron C., 2003. "Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification," Research Papers 1789, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. Lane, Robert E., 1959. "The Fear of Equality," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 35-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Bénabou & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 699-746.
    2. Jost, John T. & Blount, Sally & Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Hunyady, Gyorgy, 2003. "Fair Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings," Research Papers 1816, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    3. Sharon G.M. Koh & Grace H.Y. Lee & Eduard J. Bomhoff, 2016. "The dynamics of public opinion towards inequality in Malaysia," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 578-598, October.
    4. Roland Bénabou, 2008. "Ideology," NBER Working Papers 13907, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Christopher Hare & Tzu-Ping Liu & Robert N. Lupton, 2018. "What Ordered Optimal Classification reveals about ideological structure, cleavages, and polarization in the American mass public," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 57-78, July.
    6. Lewis A. Friedland & Hernando Rojas & Leticia Bode, 2012. "Consuming Ourselves to Dearth," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 644(1), pages 280-293, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1753r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.