Author
Listed:
- Jost, John T.
(Stanford U)
- Ignatow, Gabriel
Abstract
Organizational theory has addressed the role of metaphor in analyzing organizational culture, fostering innovation in organizational development, and in maintaining control of employees through language and socialization. We argue that metaphors can perform an additional, previously unexamined "environmental compensations" function in organizations. Qualitative content analyses of computer industry jargon indicates that the distinctive language of the high-technology industry contains an inordinate concentration of metaphors related to biological images and experiences, which can be categorized in terms of three "animal reminder" themes identified by Rozin, Haidt, and McCauley (1993); the human body, animals, and mortality. Specifically, we find that: (a) there has been a steady increase in the use of biological metaphors in the computer industry over the last three decades, (b) there seems to be a greater concentration of biological metaphors in the computer industry than in other comparable occupations, and (c) the metaphorical system reflects an overarching scheme in which technology is represented as pure, and threats to technological progress are seen as biologically impure. We propose that metaphors of life and death propagate successfully in part because they serve a compensatory function by bringing into the cognitive environment stirring and taboo topics such as the human body, mortality, animal life, which are otherwise conspicuously absent from relatively antiseptic workplace environments.
Suggested Citation
Jost, John T. & Ignatow, Gabriel, 2000.
"Idea Hampsters on the Bleeding Edge: Metaphors of Life and Death in Silicon Valley,"
Research Papers
1628, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
Handle:
RePEc:ecl:stabus:1628
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.