IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/harjfk/rwp11-001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Risse, Mathias

    (Harvard Kennedy School)

Abstract

Increasing political and economic interconnectedness draws much philosophical attention to the question of the conditions under which such stringent claims arise. Do claims of justice arise only among those who share membership in a state? Alternatively, do they arise among all those who are jointly subject to the global political and economic order? Or do they apply among all human beings simply because they are human? Inquiries into global justice differ from those into international justice precisely by not limiting inquiry to what states should do. They may well also question the very moral acceptability of states, and explore alternative arrangements. This article surveys the recent philosophical debate on global justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Risse, Mathias, 2011. "Global Justice," Working Paper Series rwp11-001, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp11-001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=7521&type=WPN
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Risse, Mathias, 2006. "What to Say about the State," Working Paper Series rwp06-008, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risse, Mathias, 2011. "Global Justice," Scholarly Articles 4669674, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Andrew Mason, 2011. "Citizenship and justice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 10(3), pages 263-281, August.
    3. Richard Child, 2011. "Global migratory potential and the scope of justice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 10(3), pages 282-300, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp11-001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ksharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.