IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/harjfk/rwp03-005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Single Audit Act: How Compliant Are Nonprofit Organizations?

Author

Listed:
  • Keating, Elizabeth K.

    (Harvard U)

  • Fischer, Mary

    (U Texas, Tyler)

  • Gordon, Teresa

    (U of Idaho)

  • Greenlee, Janet

    (U of Dayton)

Abstract

Audits are an important legal accountability tool used by resource providers (donors, grantors, and others) to assure that resources are spent by nonprofit organizations in accordance with the resource provider’s intentions. This paper reports on audits that are required by the government of the United States for organizations receiving large amounts of federal financial assistance. Since 1990, nonprofits receiving substantial federal funds are required to undergo this rigorous and expensive form of federal oversight. We report on 11,841 nonprofit entities that underwent such audits, and the 3,592 audit firms that conducted them, from 1997 to 1999. Overall, compliance with federal regulations appears to be high. Our study indicates that smaller nonprofits, those that are new to government grants, and those with prior audit findings have a significantly higher rate of adverse audit findings. Perhaps for cost or other reasons, these nonprofits are being audited by less experienced auditors. Current federal funding does not provide any additional funds for Single Audit Act compliance. One policy implication of our work might be to provide federal funding specifically for Single Audit Act compliance to these nonprofits.

Suggested Citation

  • Keating, Elizabeth K. & Fischer, Mary & Gordon, Teresa & Greenlee, Janet, 2003. "The Single Audit Act: How Compliant Are Nonprofit Organizations?," Working Paper Series rwp03-005, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp03-005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=69
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, Rw & Glezen, Gw & Jones, Tw, 1990. "Determinants Of Auditor Change In The Public-Sector," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 220-228.
    2. Raman, K. K. & Wilson, Earl R., 1992. "An empirical investigation of the market for 'single audit' services," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 271-295.
    3. Marks, Barry R. & Raman, K. K., 1986. "State audit budgets and market assessments of credit risk," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 233-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arrunada, Benito & Paz-Ares, Candido, 1997. "Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 31-61, March.
    2. David C. Hay & W. Robert Knechel & Norman Wong, 2006. "Audit Fees: A Meta†analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 141-191, March.
    3. Wenxia Ge & G. Whitmore, 2010. "Binary response and logistic regression in recent accounting research publications: a methodological note," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 81-93, January.
    4. Michael E. Bradbury & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Large audit firm premium and audit specialisation in the public sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(3), pages 657-679, September.
    5. Kevan Jensen, 2005. "A basic study of agency-cost source and municipal use of internal versus external control," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 53-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp03-005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ksharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.