IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecj/ac2003/10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Infant Death Clustering in India: Genuine Scarring vs Unobserved Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Arulampalam, Wiji

    (University of Warwick)

  • Sonia Bhalotra

Abstract

Data from a range of different environments indicate that the incidence of death is not randomly distributed across children or households but, rather, that there is death clustering within households. A hypothesis of considerable interest for both theory and policy is that there is a causal process whereby the death of a child influences the risk of death of the succeeding child in the family. This causal effect which, drawing language from the literature on unemployment, we term scarring or genuine state dependence tends to be confounded with both observable and unobservable inter-family heterogeneity. In this paper, we investigate the extent of genuine scarring in three Indian states, controlling for these confounding factors. The paper offers a number of methodological innovations upon previous research in the area and, thereby, offers what we expect are more robust estimates of the scarring effect. Classification-O12, I12, C25, J13

Suggested Citation

  • Arulampalam, Wiji & Sonia Bhalotra, 2003. "Infant Death Clustering in India: Genuine Scarring vs Unobserved Heterogeneity," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 10, Royal Economic Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/res2003/Arulampalam2.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iyer, S. & Weeks, M., 2009. "Social Interactions, Ethnicity and Fertility in Kenya," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0903, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    death clustering; state dependence; unobserved heterogeneity; random effects probit; dynamic model;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.