IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecj/ac2002/155.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

'Quarbs' and Efficiency in Spread Betting Markets: can you beat the book?

Author

Listed:
  • Paton, David

    (Nottingham University Business School)

  • Leighton Vaughan Williams

    (Nottingham Trent University)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine a relatively novel form of gambling, index (or spread) betting, that mirrors (and indeed overlaps with) practices in conventional financial markets. In this form of betting, a number of bookmakers quote a bid-offer spread about the result of some future event, and bettors are invited to buy (sell) at the top (bottom) end of the quoted spreads. We hypothesise that the existence of an outlying spread may provide uninformed traders with information that can be used to develop improved trading strategies. Using conditional moment tests on data from a popular spread betting market in the United Kingdom, we find that in the presence of a number of price-setters, the market mid-point is indeed a better predictor of asset values than the outlying price. We further show that this information can be used to develop trading strategies that lead to returns that are consistently positive and superior to those from noise trading and, in some cases, significantly so.

Suggested Citation

  • Paton, David & Leighton Vaughan Williams, 2002. "'Quarbs' and Efficiency in Spread Betting Markets: can you beat the book?," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 155, Royal Economic Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/res2002/Paton.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Incentives at the racetrack
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2007-09-26 20:13:06

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.