IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1173.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Turning the Page: The Impact of Choice Closure on Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Yangjie
  • Botti, Simona
  • Faro, David

Abstract

After having made a purchase decision, consumers often revisit their choice and ponder forgone alternatives. This tendency can cause regret and lower satisfaction with the selected alternative, especially when choices are difficult. This paper introduces the concept of choice closure, defined as the psychological process by which consumers come to perceive a decision to be final. Choice closure inhibits consumers’ propensity to reconsider the decision process after a choice has been made and to engage in unfavorable comparisons between the chosen and the forgone options. Four studies show that physical acts that are metaphorically associated with the concept of closure — such as covering or turning a page on the rejected alternatives — trigger choice closure for choices made from large sets and result in greater satisfaction. These findings suggest that subtle cues, which do not alter the actual choice context, can improve consumers’ satisfaction with a difficult decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Yangjie & Botti, Simona & Faro, David, 2013. "Turning the Page: The Impact of Choice Closure on Satisfaction," HEC Research Papers Series 1173, HEC Paris, revised 19 Oct 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2831596
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Choice Closure; Satisfaction;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antoine Haldemann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hecpafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.