IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/drx/wpaper/202522.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Low-Hanging Fruit of the Single European Market: New Methods and Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel Fontagne

    (Paris School of Economics)

  • Yoto Yotov

    (School of Economics, Drexel University)

Abstract

We propose and construct novel measures of the effectiveness and potential of trade blocs, combining estimation with granular data and simulation with a New Quantitative Trade Model. We deploy our methods and new indexes to quantify the potential benefits from (i) further integration within the largest and most successful trade liberalization effort in the world – the Single European Market – and (ii) a possible enlargement. Three main results and implications stand out from our analysis. First, European integration has been very effective in promoting trade among its members, with heterogeneous effects across industries and member states. Second, and most novel and important, our estimates reveal that only half of the potential benefits from EU membership have been realized to date. Third, EU accession will generate very large gains from trade for the new joiners and moderate gains for existing members, with larger benefits for some small and peripheral EU members. Importantly, our methods enable us to construct confidence bounds for the effects of EU enlargement.

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel Fontagne & Yoto Yotov, 2025. "The Low-Hanging Fruit of the Single European Market: New Methods and Measures," Working Papers 202522, Center for Global Policy Analysis, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
  • Handle: RePEc:drx:wpaper:202522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.lebow.drexel.edu/sites/default/files/2025-04/202522-cgpa-low-hanging-fruit.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Integration; Trade Costs; Trade Cost Efficiency; Single Market Potential;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:drx:wpaper:202522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yoto V. Yotov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdreus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.