IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dls/wpaper/0326.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incidencia Distributiva de las Transferencias de Ingresos: Nuevas Estimaciones para Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Gasparini

    (CEDLAS-IIE-FCE-UNLP & CONICET)

  • Iván Albina

    (CEDLAS-IIE-FCE-UNLP)

  • Luis Laguinge

    (CEDLAS-IIE-FCE-UNLP & CONICET)

Abstract

Este trabajo estima la incidencia distributiva de los programas de transferencia de ingresos (PTI) a nivel nacional de Argentina para el año 2022. El trabajo extiende las estimaciones disponibles en varias direcciones: abarca la totalidad de los principales PTI del país, propone una más cuidadosa identificación de los beneficiarios de cada programa y utiliza estimaciones del ingreso ajustado por subdeclaración para calcular los resultados de incidencia. En conjunto, las estimaciones proveen un panorama más actualizado y preciso del impacto distributivo directo de la política social en Argentina.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Gasparini & Iván Albina & Luis Laguinge, 2024. "Incidencia Distributiva de las Transferencias de Ingresos: Nuevas Estimaciones para Argentina," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0326, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
  • Handle: RePEc:dls:wpaper:0326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/doc_cedlas326.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francois Bourguignon & Luiz A. Pereira da Silva, 2003. "The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution : Evaluation Techniques and Tools," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15090.
    2. Rossignolo, Darío, 2018. "Equidad de género del sistema tributario en la Argentina: estimación de la carga fiscal desglosada por tipo de hogar," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    3. Leonardo Gasparini & Guillermo Cruces, 2010. "Las asignaciones universales por hijo en Argentina: Impacto, discusión y alternativas," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0, pages 145-186, January-D.
    4. Leonardo Gasparini & Guillermo Cruces, 2010. "Las asignaciones universales por hijo en Argentina: Impacto, discusión y alternativas," Económica, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0, pages 145-186, January-D.
    5. Leonardo Gasparini & Guillermo Cruces, 2010. "Las Asignaciones Universales Por Hijo. Impacto, Discusión y Alternativas," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0102, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nora Lustig & Carola Pessino, 2013. "Social spending and income redistribution in Argentina during the 2000s: The rising noncontributory pensions," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 05, Tulane University, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2013.
    2. Cruces, Guillermo & Perez-Truglia, Ricardo & Tetaz, Martin, 2013. "Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 100-112.
    3. Nora Lustig & Carola Pessino, 2012. "Social Spending and Income Redistribution in Argentina During the 2000s: the Rising Role of Noncontributory Pensions. Extended Version," Working Papers 276, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    4. Nora Lustig & Carola Pessino, 2012. "Social Spending and Income Redistribution in Argentina During the 2000s: the Rising Role of Noncontributory Pensions," Working Papers 1221, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    5. Garganta, Santiago & Gasparini, Leonardo, 2015. "The impact of a social program on labor informality: The case of AUH in Argentina," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 99-110.
    6. Santiago Garganta & Leonardo Gasparini & Mariana Marchionni, 2017. "Cash transfers and female labor force participation: the case of AUH in Argentina," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Fabianna Bacil & Beatriz Burattini & João Pedro Lang & Camila Rolon & Merindah Loessl, 2022. "Las transferencias en efectivo con enfoque universal en América Latina y el Caribe," Research Report Spanish (Country Study) 65, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    8. De Santis, Mariana & Caggia, Mauricio, 2017. "Preferencias por la distribución del ingreso. Un análisis empírico para Argentina entre 1995 y 2012 [Preferences for the distribution of income. An empirical analisys for Argentina between 1995 and," MPRA Paper 96579, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Paola Pena, 2014. "The Politics of the diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 20114, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    10. Echeverría, Lucía, 2020. "Modelos colectivos de consumo y distribución intra-hogar. Teoría y aplicaciones," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3832, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    11. Nora Lustig & Carola Pessino, 2014. "Social Spending and Income Redistribution in Argentina during the 2000s: The Increasing Role of Noncontributory Pensions," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(3), pages 304-325, May.
    12. Nora Lustig & Carola Pessino, 2013. "Social spending and income redistribution in Argentina during the 2000s: The rising noncontributory pensions," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 1305, Tulane University, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2013.
    13. Santiago Garganta & Leonardo Gasparini & Mariana Marchionni & Mariano Tappatá, 2017. "The Effect of Cash Transfers on Fertility: Evidence from Argentina," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(1), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Maria Sol Gonzalez & Maria Emma Santos, 2023. "Sustainable Cities, Smart Investments: A Characterization of “A Thousand Days-San Miguel”, a Program for Vulnerable Early Childhood in Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-29, August.
    15. María Edo & Mariana Marchionni & Santiago Garganta, 2015. "Conditional Cash Transfer Programs and Enforcement of Compulsory Education Laws. The case of Asignación Universal por Hijo in Argentina," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0190, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    16. Darío Alejandro Rossignolo, 2021. "Efecto de subsidios económicos sobre la distribución del ingreso personal y regional en Argentina," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4518, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    17. Sepúlveda, Magdalena, 2014. "The rights-based approach to social protection in Latin America: From rhetoric to practice," Políticas Sociales 37517, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Rathinasamy Maria Saleth & Arlene Inocencio & Andrew Noble & Sawaeng Ruaysoongnern, 2009. "Economic gains of improving soil fertility and water holding capacity with clay application: the impact of soil remediation research in Northeast Thailand," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 336-352.
    19. Jose Cuesta & Jon Jellema & Lucia Ferrone, 2021. "Fiscal Policy, Multidimensional Poverty, and Equity in Uganda: A Child-Lens Analysis," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 427-458, June.
    20. Eugenio Zucchelli & Andrew M Jones & Nigel Rice, 2012. "The evaluation of health policies through dynamic microsimulation methods," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 5(1), pages 2-20.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dls:wpaper:0326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Pacheco (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/funlpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.