IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwwpp/dp958.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der Einfluss von Erhebungsformen auf den Postmaterialismus-Index

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Marcus

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag ist eine Metaanalyse von 99 deutschen Bevölkerungssurveys aus dem GESIS-Datenarchiv, in denen die postmaterialistische Einstellung der Befragten ermittelt wird. Es wird anhand von Mehrebenenmodellen gezeigt, dass sich der Anteil der Postmaterialisten unter Kontrolle von Geburtsjahr der Befragten und Erhebungsjahr des Surveys überzufällig zwischen den Surveys unterscheidet. Diese Differenzen sind zum Teil auf unterschiedliche Formen der Datenerhebung zurückzuführen. Insbesondere die ALLBUS- und Eurobarometer-Serien differieren stark. Zudem sind ein Institutseffekt und ein Effekt durch Quotenstichproben auszumachen.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Marcus, 2009. "Der Einfluss von Erhebungsformen auf den Postmaterialismus-Index," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 958, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.345209.de/dp958.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylke Nissen, 2014. "The Eurobarometer and the process of European integration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 713-727, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Postmaterialism index; survey methods; multilevel analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.