IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/77467.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ökonomisch-kriminologische Evaluation des Justizvollzugs: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern im bundesdeutschen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Entorf, Horst
  • Meyer, Susanne
  • Möbert, Jochen

Abstract

Die vorliegende Dokumentation beinhaltet eine länderspezifische Spezialauswertung einer bundesweiten Feldstudie. Die Erhebung über die Situation der Inhaftierten, der Anstalten und eine vergleichende Analyse der Bundesländer stellen eine in diesem Umfang wohl bisher einzigartige Evaluation des deutschen Strafvollzugs dar. In dieser Kurzversion werden – anhand der Darstellung eines ausgewählten Bundeslandes – beispielhaft die Ergebnisse eines Bundeslandes – Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns - mit bundesweiten Ergebnissen verglichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Entorf, Horst & Meyer, Susanne & Möbert, Jochen, 2009. "Ökonomisch-kriminologische Evaluation des Justizvollzugs: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern im bundesdeutschen Vergleich," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77467, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:77467
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/77467/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/4743
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Entorf, Horst, 2007. "Evaluation des Maßregelvollzugs: Grundzüge einer Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35718, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:77467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.