IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/138565.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Are We Averse Towards Algorithms? A Comprehensive Literature Review on Algorithm Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Jussupow, Ekaterina
  • Benbasat, Izak
  • Heinzl, Armin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jussupow, Ekaterina & Benbasat, Izak & Heinzl, Armin, 2020. "Why Are We Averse Towards Algorithms? A Comprehensive Literature Review on Algorithm Aversion," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 138565, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:138565
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/138565/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/168/?utm_source=aisel.aisnet.org%2Fecis2020_rp%2F168&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mallory Avery & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2023. "Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech," Monash Economics Working Papers 2023-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    2. Gregory Weitzner, 2024. "Reputational Algorithm Aversion," Papers 2402.15418, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    3. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2023. "Measuring Preferences for Algorithms - Are people really algorithm averse after seeing the algorithm perform?," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277692, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Gaube, Susanne & Biebl, Isabell & Engelmann, Magdalena Karin Maria & Kleine, Anne-Kathrin & Lermer, Eva, 2024. "Comparing preferences for skin cancer screening: AI-enabled app vs dermatologist," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    6. Bansak, Kirk & Paulson, Elisabeth, 2023. "Public Opinion on Fairness and Efficiency for Algorithmic and Human Decision-Makers," OSF Preprints pghmx, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:138565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.