IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ctl/louvir/2009008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marshall and Walras : Incompatible Bedfellows ?

Author

Listed:
  • Michel DE VROEY

    (UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES))

Abstract

The standard view about the relation between the Marshallian and the Walrasian approaches is that they are complementary to each other. My aim in this paper is to show that, on the contrary, they constitute alternative sub-research programs within the wider neoclassical paradigm. I make my point by contrasting the two approaches against the following benchmarks : the purpose of economic theory according to Marshall and Walras, their views as the role of mathematics, their ways of looking at the working of the economy as whole, the conception of equilibrium underpinning their theories and finally their trade organization assumptions

Suggested Citation

  • Michel DE VROEY, 2009. "Marshall and Walras : Incompatible Bedfellows ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2009008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    • Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvir:2009008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2009008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Groenewegen, 1995. "A SOARING EAGLE: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michel De Vroey, 2014. "Backhouse and Boianovsky on "disequilibrium theory". A review article of transforming modern macroeconomics. Exploring disequilibrium microfoundations, 1956-2003," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 724-742, August.
    2. De Vroey Michel & Duarte Pedro Garcia, 2013. "In search of lost time: the neoclassical synthesis," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 965-995, January.
    3. Richard Arena & Katia Caldari, 2019. "Léon Walras and Alfred Marshall : microeconomic rational choice or human and social nature?," Working Papers halshs-02400844, HAL.
    4. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2018. "The pre-history of econophysics and the history of economics: Boltzmann versus the marginalists," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 89-98.
    5. Michel De Vroey, 2012. "Microfoundations: A Decisive Dividing Line between Keynesian and New Classical Macroeconomics?," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Michel de Vroey, 2018. "The History of Recent Macroeconomics Through the Lens of the Marshall-Walras Divide," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2018018, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    7. Pierrick Clerc & Michel De Vroey, 2020. "Brunner Versus Friedman: Diverging Aspirations For The Monetarist Project," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2020027, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    8. De Vroey, Michel, 2011. "Lucas on the relationship between theory and ideology," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 5, pages 1-39.
    9. Marek Hudik, 2019. "Two interpretations of the rational choice theory and the relevance of behavioral critique," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(4), pages 464-489, November.
    10. Michel De Vroey, 2010. "Getting rid of Keynes ? A survey of the history of macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and beyond," Working Paper Research 187, National Bank of Belgium.
    11. Richard Arena & Katia Caldari, 2019. "Léon Walras and Alfred Marshall: Microeconomic Rational Choice or Human and Social Nature?," GREDEG Working Papers 2019-33, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Brzezinski, 2010. "Marshall in Poland," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, 2015. "Alfred Marshall's Puzzles. Between Economics as a Positive Science and Economic Chivalry," Lodz Economics Working Papers 5/2015, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology.
    3. Arrigo Opocher & Ian Steedman, 2008. "The industry supply curve: Two different traditions," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 247-274.
    4. Neil Hart, 2003. "Marshall’s Dilemma: Equilibrium versus Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1139-1160, December.
    5. Richard Nielsen & Felipe Massa, 2013. "Reintegrating Ethics and Institutional Theories," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 135-147, June.
    6. Virginie Gouverneur, 2021. "Family and Women in Alfred Marshall’s Analysis of Progress and Well-being," Working Papers of BETA 2021-03, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Francisco Louca, 1999. "The econometric challenge to Keynes: arguments and contradictions in the early debates about a late issue," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 404-438.
    8. Marco Dardi, 2010. "Marshall on welfare, or: the 'utilitarian' meets the 'evolver'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 405-437.
    9. Filippo Pietrini, 2025. "The Dissemination of Marx in England: a Quantitative Assessment," Working Papers - Economics wp2025_01.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    10. Brian J. Loasby, 2012. "Knowledge in Marshall," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Virginie Gouverneur, 2021. "Family and Women in Alfred Marshall’s Analysis of Progress and Well-being," Working Papers 02-21, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    12. Marco Dardi, 2014. "Neither Lausanne nor Cambridge: Pantaleoni and the missing boundary between economics and sociology," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 485-519, June.
    13. Geoffrey C. Harcourt, 2016. "Reflections on Keynes's Essays in Biography," Discussion Papers 2016-10A, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    14. Sandelin, Bo, 2015. "The Pioneers’ Arguments for Formulating Economic Problems Mathematically," Working Papers in Economics 633, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    15. Joseph Persky, 2017. "Producer co-operatives in nineteenth-century British economic thought," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 319-340, March.
    16. William T. Ganley, 1998. "Poverty and Charity: Early Analytical Conflicts between Institutional Economics and Neoclassicism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 433-440, June.
    17. Katia Caldari & Fabio Masini, 2011. "Pigouvian versus Marshallian tax: market failure, public intervention and the problem of externalities," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 715-732, December.
    18. Michael McLure, 2010. "Pareto, Pigou and third-party consumption: divergent approaches to welfare theory with implications for the study of public finance," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 635-657.
    19. Katia Caldari & Tamotsu Nishizawa, 2016. "Progress beyond growth: Some insights from Marshall's final book," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 226-245, April.
    20. Michael V. White, 2015. "A peculiar archaeology: Searching for Mr Giffen's behaviour," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 26-50, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctl:louvir:2009008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Virginie LEBLANC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iruclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.