IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/werepe/we064111.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A consistent specification test for models defined by conditional moment restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Lobato, Ignacio N.
  • Domínguez, Manuel A.

Abstract

This article addresses statistical inference in models defined by conditional moment restrictions. Our motivation comes from two observations. First, generalized method of moments, which is the most popular methodology for statistical inference for these models, provides a unified methodology for statistical inference, but it yields inconsistent statistical procedures. Second, consistent specification testing for these models has abandoned a unified approach by regarding as unrelated parameter estimation and model checking. In this article, we provide a consistent specification test, which allows us to propose a simple unified methodology that yields consistent statistical procedures. Although the test enjoys optimality properties, the asymptotic distribution of the considered test statistic depends on the specific data generating process. Therefore, standard asymptotic inference procedures are not feasible. Nevertheless, we show that a simple original wild bootstrap procedure properly estimates the asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobato, Ignacio N. & Domínguez, Manuel A., 2006. "A consistent specification test for models defined by conditional moment restrictions," UC3M Working papers. Economics we064111, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we064111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/63eb0bec-6bc6-4eb5-b25e-3f61a59b4ab9/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrasco, Marine & Florens, Jean-Pierre, 2000. "Generalization Of Gmm To A Continuum Of Moment Conditions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 797-834, December.
    2. Tauchen, George, 1985. "Diagnostic testing and evaluation of maximum likelihood models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 415-443.
    3. Bierens, Herman J, 1990. "A Consistent Conditional Moment Test of Functional Form," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(6), pages 1443-1458, November.
    4. Manuel Dominguez & Ignacio Lobato, 2003. "Testing the Martingale Difference Hypothesis," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 351-377.
    5. Bierens, Herman J., 1982. "Consistent model specification tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 105-134, October.
    6. Delgado, Miguel A. & Fiteni, Inmaculada, 2002. "External bootstrap tests for parameter stability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 275-303, August.
    7. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2006. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Linear and Nonlinear Time Series Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 531-541, June.
    8. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 1990. "A Unified Approach to Robust, Regression-Based Specification Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 17-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lavergne, Pascal & Nguimkeu, Pierre, 2016. "A Hausman Specification Test of Conditional Moment Restrictions," TSE Working Papers 16-743, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Dominguez & Ignacio Lobato, 2010. "Consistent Inference in Models Defined by COnditional Moment Restrictions: an Alternative to GMM," Working Papers 1005, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
    2. Paulo Parente & Richard Smith, 2012. "Exogeneity in semiparametric moment condition models," CeMMAP working papers 30/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2006. "A Consistent Diagnostic Test For Regression Models Using Projections," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 1030-1051, December.
    4. Manuel Vega-Gordillo & José Luis à lvarez-Arce, 2005. "Heterogeneity In Economic Freedom: Free Clusters Or Free Countries," Faculty Working Papers 08/05, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    5. Silva João M. C. Santos & Tenreyro Silvana & Windmeijer Frank, 2015. "Testing Competing Models for Non-negative Data with Many Zeros," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 29-46, January.
    6. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Xiaojun Song & Qi Xu, 2022. "Covariate distribution balance via propensity scores," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1093-1120, September.
    7. Wang, Xuexin, 2015. "A Note on Consistent Conditional Moment Tests," MPRA Paper 69005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Jacho-Chávez, David T., 2010. "Approximating the critical values of Cramér-von Mises tests in general parametric conditional specifications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 625-636, March.
    9. Krikamol Muandet & Wittawat Jitkrittum & Jonas Kubler, 2020. "Kernel Conditional Moment Test via Maximum Moment Restriction," Papers 2002.09225, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    10. Pascal Lavergne & Valentin Patilea, 2011. "One for All and All for One: Regression Checks With Many Regressors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 41-52, January.
    11. Skeels, Christopher L. & Vella, Francis, 1999. "A Monte Carlo investigation of the sampling behavior of conditional moment tests in Tobit and Probit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 275-294, October.
    12. Kunyang Song & Feiyu Jiang & Ke Zhu, 2024. "Estimation for conditional moment models based on martingale difference divergence," Papers 2404.11092, arXiv.org.
    13. Liangjun Su & Yundong Tu & Aman Ullah, 2015. "Testing Additive Separability of Error Term in Nonparametric Structural Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6-10), pages 1057-1088, December.
    14. Parente, Paulo M.D.C. & Smith, Richard J., 2017. "Tests of additional conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-16.
    15. J. S. Allison & M. Hušková & S. G. Meintanis, 2018. "Testing the adequacy of semiparametric transformation models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 70-94, March.
    16. James Davidson & Andreea G. Halunga, 2013. "Consistent Model Specification Testing," Discussion Papers 1312, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    17. Stéphane Goutte & David Guerreiro & Bilel Sanhaji & Sophie Saglio & Julien Chevallier, 2019. "International Financial Markets," Post-Print halshs-02183053, HAL.
    18. Colling, Benjamin & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models using the integrated regression function," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016031, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    19. Ellison, Glenn & Ellison, Sara Fisher, 2000. "A simple framework for nonparametric specification testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Yi-Ting Chen, 2008. "A unified approach to standardized-residuals-based correlation tests for GARCH-type models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 111-133.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we064111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eco.uc3m.es/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.