IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csi/report/04_005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Moving from Piecemeal Accounting to a Pragmatic Economic Approach to Water Pricing in Australia

Author

Abstract

It is often said that water is under-priced and that if the full cost of water were charged, water use would be more sustainable. Moving from a statement to actual practice requires a shift in thinking about the fundamental economics. Australia has embarked on a process of economic reform and part of the reform package in the water sector has required States within Australia to report on progress towards full cost pricing, including the set of costs and in some circumstances, benefits, through changes to the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Darla Hatton MacDonald & Sebastien Lamontagne, 2004. "Moving from Piecemeal Accounting to a Pragmatic Economic Approach to Water Pricing in Australia," Natural Resource Management Economics 04_005, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Handle: RePEc:csi:report:04_005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.luwrr.com/contents.html
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    water; full cost; economics; externalities; Murray-Darling Basin;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csi:report:04_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcia Sanderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pecsiau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.