IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csi/report/03_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An opportunity to improve water trading in the South East Catchment of South Australia

Author

Abstract

This paper outlines how an area-based water allocation system for irrigating crops could be converted to a system of shares, structured so as to allow the development of a low cost trading market for water and salinity shares. It stresses the need for separation of entitlements of water from land and the separation of water rights into their various components. By moving to this type of allocation system, combined with some safeguard provisions, trade in groundwater could be facilitated in the South East Water Catchment located in the State of South Australia. Separation of salinity and other environmental impacts from water volume trading will allow market assessment of highest and best use to include consideration of environmental impacts. Although the focus of the paper is on groundwater allocation and management, the principles and concepts outlined are applicable to surface water systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Young & Darla Hatton MacDonald, 2003. "An opportunity to improve water trading in the South East Catchment of South Australia," Natural Resource Management Economics 03_01, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Handle: RePEc:csi:report:03_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iwaponline.com/wp/00502/wp005020127.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view journal
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mike Young, 2004. "Allocation and coordination of Water Resources: Towards a National Water Policy Framework: Vision to Implmentation. Conference proceedings. United Nations Association (Victoria) Inc," Natural Resource Management Economics 04_003, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Australia; policy; environmental management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csi:report:03_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcia Sanderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pecsiau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.