IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csa/wpaper/1995-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On kin groups and employment in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Collier
  • Ashish Garg

Abstract

A common feature of African societies is that individuals belong to kin groups which impose reciprocal obligations upon their members. While kin groups are found in other societies, African kin groups are distinctive both by their ubiquity and by the strength of their claims upon members. Section 2 summarises current economic interpretations of kin groups as insurance and transfer institutions which succeed in lowering transactions costs in the traditional, small-scale economy. However, in the modern economy, where large scale production is required, firms must employ multiple kin groups. The resulting employment relations between managers and workers differ from those in which the basic unit is the individual employee. Kin groups will attempt to favour their own members in the assignment of good jobs. A kin group may be restrained in its favouritism either by competition from rival kin groups or by promotion practices imposed by top management. Even though kin group favouritism may be rife, it is not readily observable on conventional labour market data sets. Although we utilise an unusually rich Ghanaian data set, it still does not provide direct evidence enabling us to test whether managers favour workers from their own kin group. However, in Section 3 we set out a model in which kin group favouritism is shown to give rise to a wage premium for the largest kin group. Since our data includes the size of kin groups, and since these vary across localities, we are able to test for kin group favouritism indirectly by investigating whether there is a wage premium purely related to membership of the locally largest kin group. In Section 4 we test for kin group favouritism in Ghana, treating separately private and public firms. We find that in the private sector there is no evidence for kin group favouritism: workers are paid their marginal product. By contrast, in the public sector workers are rewarded for membership of the right kin group, but not for productive characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Collier & Ashish Garg, 1995. "On kin groups and employment in Africa," CSAE Working Paper Series 1995-16, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1995-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9d1084a8-a13b-440c-b3c2-56764ca484bf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adeola F. Adenikinju & Olugboyega Oyeranti, 1999. "Characteristics and Behaviour of African Factor Markets and Market Institutions and Their Consequences for Economic Growth," CID Working Papers 31A, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Eliana La Ferrara, "undated". "Ethnicity and Reciprocity: A model of Credit Transactions in Ghana," Working Papers 193, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    3. Mkhululi Ncube, 2005. "Wages Through Booms And Recessions: A Case Study Of Zimbabwe," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 73(3), pages 510-532, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1995-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julia Coffey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.