IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2004-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Etude de l’Homophilie Sociopro-fessionnelle à travers l’enquête contacts

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Sophie Cousteaux

    (Crest)

  • Yannick Lemel

    (Crest)

Abstract

We know that there is in our companies(societies) a tendency to the homogamie. What ishe(it) in the friendly relations? Does the choice of the friends answer the same logic of socialnearness as that of the spouse? In statistical terms, to answer this question means wondering ifwe observe a quasi-diagonal structure of the picture(board) of contingency crossing the socialcategory of a person with that of his friend. This note will lean on the inquiry " Contactsbetween the persons ", realized in 1982-83, to study the structure of such paintings(boards).Three methods will be used and their compared results: the analysis of the binarycorrespondences (for whom(which) we used the SPAD software), the models RC of Goodman(used software: Lem) and the multidimensional scaling (used software: HIS(ITS,HER)). Weshall examine, in particular, in which measure this possible quasi-diagonal structure can beused to build scales(ladders) of social nearness. The comparison of scales(ladders) calculatedat the first two levels of the wordlist of the social and occupational groups will allow to judgeof the reliability of the order of obtained status.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Sophie Cousteaux & Yannick Lemel, 2004. "Etude de l’Homophilie Sociopro-fessionnelle à travers l’enquête contacts," Working Papers 2004-10, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2004-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2004-10.pdf
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2004-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.