IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/slpbrf/slp81.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Has COVID Affected Pensions for Workers without Social Security?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre Aubry
  • Kevin Wandrei

Abstract

At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many observers feared that the resulting recession would undermine workers’ employer-sponsored retirement plans. The one-quarter of state and local government workers who are not coverd by Social Security would have been particularly vulnerable, as they lack the buffer this program provides. For this group, a prolonged recession, with poor investment returns and government revenue shortfalls, would have eroded the finances of their defined benefit plans – their only source of retirement income. This brief – based on a recent study – assesses how COVID affected the pensions of these noncovered workers.2 The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section briefly describes the universe of state and local plans for workers who are not covered by Social Security (i.e., noncovered plans). The second section documents the impact of COVID-19 on the current financial status of these plans. The third section examines the likelihood that noncovered plans will default on their future benefit promises due to depleted pension trust fund assets. The final section concludes that the impact of COVID on noncovered plans has been minimal and, looking forward, structural headwinds such as negative cash flows and lower-than-expected investment returns continue to pose little risk to their ability to pay future benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre Aubry & Kevin Wandrei, 2022. "Has COVID Affected Pensions for Workers without Social Security?," State and Local Pension Plans Briefs slp81, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:slpbrf:slp81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/has-covid-affected-pensions-for-workers-without-social-security/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:slpbrf:slp81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.