IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/jusfac/jtf-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sex And 401(k) Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila Campbell

    (Center for Retirement Research)

  • Alicia H. Munnell

Abstract

Over the past two decades, private pension coverage has shifted from defined benefit plans to 401(k) plans. This shift has many important implications for the retirement security of older Americans. One so-far-overlooked consequence is that it has changed the relative price of annuities for men and women. Annuities are financial instruments that guarantee retirees a lifetime stream of income in exchange for an initial premium payment. The reason for the change in the price is that annuities provided under the two types of plans are regulated by different legal regimes. Federal labor law covers annuities provided through defined benefit pension plans, and labor law requires equal pay for equal work. The Courts have interpreted this requirement to mean that a man and a woman with equal earnings histories should receive equal monthly pension benefits. Since women and men have different average life expectancies, they will receive different lifetime benefits. In contrast, 401(k) plans do not generally offer annuities; they provide lump-sum payments at retirement. Retirees who want to annuitize the lump sums must take the money to an insurance company, which will sell them a single premium individual annuity (SPIA). Insurance companies, which are regulated by state insurance law, will provide smaller benefits to women and larger benefits to men than would defined benefit plans. Since women live longer than men do on average, men and women as groups will receive equal lifetime benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila Campbell & Alicia H. Munnell, 2002. "Sex And 401(k) Plans," Just the Facts jtf-4, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:jusfac:jtf-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/sex-and-401k-plans/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:jusfac:jtf-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.