Author
Listed:
- Laura D. Quinby
- Gal Wettstein
Abstract
The 2021 Trustees Report projects that the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) program faces a long-term financing shortfall and that the trust fund will deplete its reserves in little more than a decade, after which payroll tax revenues will cover only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits. Yet, news coverage of the Trustees Report often emphasizes the trust fund depletion date and de-emphasizes the importance of the ongoing tax revenues. This emphasis could lead the public to believe that all future benefits are insecure, as many surveys find. The question is, how do workers respond to their misperceptions? On the one hand, they might claim their benefits earlier than originally planned in the belief that future reforms will spare individuals already on the rolls from benefit reductions – even though, if they claim at age 62 today, their monthly benefit will be reduced by 30 percent for claiming early, and their lifetime benefits will likely be lower as well. On the other hand, workers might insure against future reductions in Social Security benefits by saving more on their own, thereby enhancing their retirement prospects. To answer the question, this brief reports on a recent study that used an online experiment to gauge how different headlines about Social Security’s finances affected planned claiming age, benefit expectations, and savings intentions. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section provides background on Social Security’s actuarial projections and how they are communicated to the public, while the second section explains the experiment. The third section presents results showing that headlines about the trust fund lead to a shift in intended claiming ages and expected benefit levels, but not future savings goals. The final section concludes that media coverage makes many workers fear an unrealistically severe cut to their future Social Security benefits, and this fear could lead people to claim early, locking in lower monthly benefits without increased saving to make up the gap.
Suggested Citation
Laura D. Quinby & Gal Wettstein, 2021.
"Do Men Who Work Longer Live Longer? Evidence from the Netherlands,"
Issues in Brief
ib2021-17, Center for Retirement Research.
Handle:
RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2021-17
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2021-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.