IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2019-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Has Poverty Declined for Widows?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
  • Alice Zulkarnain

Abstract

In the mid-1990s, the poverty rate for widows ages 65-85 was 20 percent. Since then, it has dropped sharply. Why did this decline occur and will it continue? This brief, based on a recent paper, addresses these questions by exploring three factors that could have contributed to the decline. The first is the rise in women’s educational attainment. The second is the rise in women’s work experience. The third is shifting marriage patterns, with women of higher socioeconomic status (SES) now more likely to be married than their lower-SES counterparts. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section describes the three factors that could have reduced widows’ poverty and how they have changed over recent decades. The second section quantifies how much of the decline in widows’ poverty can be explained by each factor. The third section projects what might happen to widows’ poverty in the next decade. The final section concludes that increases in education and work experience have driven the decline in widows’ poverty to date, but marriage selection will likely play a significant role in a continuing decline in the future. Still, even after these effects play out, widows’ poverty will remain well above that of married women.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher & Alice Zulkarnain, 2019. "Why Has Poverty Declined for Widows?," Issues in Brief ib2019-4, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/why-has-poverty-declined-for-widows/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.